The 1 to 16 Format : Redesigning the Playoffs for the NHL and the NBA

If you’ve been following pro sports pretty closely this year, you probably noticed one flagrant similarity between the NHL and the NBA; in both cases, the Western conference was significantly stronger than the Eastern conference. Both the LA Kings and San Antonio Spurs cruised to a title in 5 games against Eastern conference opponents in their respective championship series.

In both leagues, the dominance came from opening night through the final buzzer. In the NHL, the Western conference was almost 6 points or 3 full wins better per team than the East was during the regular season. In the NBA, the West was nearly 8 wins better per team that the East. At 48-34, the Phoenix Suns finished 9th in the East and failed to make the playoffs; they would have been tied for 3rd in the East. Or, to flip the scenario, with the same record, the Toronto Raptors (48-34) would not have made the playoffs in the West.

And this #WestIsBest trend isn’t new – it’s been like this for quite some time now in both leagues. Since Michael Jordan left the Bulls for good in 1999, the NBA’s West teams have been, on average, more than 4 wins per season better than the East teams in the regular season (43.03 wins per season for the West, 38.86 for the East). That’s substantial.

How substantial? Using ESPN’s Estimated Wins Added metric (that measures a player’s value to his team), a difference of 4 wins per year would be like having 2013-2014 Paul George instead of 2013-2014 Rudy Gay at small forward for 15 consecutive years. Imagine that Raptors fans. Either way you look at it, it’s dominance. The East only had one season in the past 15 years with a better combined record than the West, and that was in 2009 (by a fairly small margin, 41.4 average wins to 40.6). The West has won 10 of the 15 championships.

It’s a similar picture in the NHL, where the dominance hasn’t been as imposing as the NBA, but even more consistent in the regular season. In the same 15-year span (since the loser point became a thing in 2000), the West has been better than the East in every single season. West teams have racked up, on average, about 2.5 points more per season than the East. But interestingly enough, the Stanley Cups in that stretch only slightly favour the West, 8-7.

Which brings me to my biggest issue, which is that we need to start rewarding regular season success properly : by having the 16 best teams in the playoffs, regardless of the conference, with the matchups as 1 vs. 16, 2 vs. 15, and so on.

So many reasons to go to this format:

1. It places more importance on the regular season in its entirety. Because home ice and overall seeding are at a premium, teams can’t coast through the year in an easier conference (Pittsburgh Penguins and Miami Heat, we’re looking at you). The Pens were able to rest guys at the end of the season because they had the 2nd seeded pretty much locked in for the final month. But with 1 through 16 seeding, they would’ve had the 5th seed, which means they were only guaranteed home ice for the first round. Furthermore, all inter-conference games become more meaningful because of the playoff race. That outdoor game at Wrigley Field this year between Chicago and Pittsburgh? Could’ve been a mammoth game in the playoff race in this scenario (the Pens finished just 2 points ahead of the Hawks in league standings). Instead, it was kind of a letdown.
2. Better odds at great late-playoff matchups. You always get the chance of having the two best teams facing off in the championship series (Stanley Cup Final or NBA Finals) regardless of their conference. Looking back at this year’s Stanley Cup Playoffs, it’s clear now that the “real” championship series was Chicago-LA. Because the West was that much stronger, the winner of the conference finals was pretty much a lock to win it all. And sure, we may not have had Chicago against Los Angeles in the Cup Finals under this structure, but we probably would have had 2 West teams, which would’ve have been the better hockey matchup.
3. More parity (or at least a fairer draft structure). Here’s where things get interesting, and it’s something we almost never consider. (I’m not taking any credit for this; I heard it from San Antonio Spurs General Manager RC Buford, a man who knows a thing or two about winning in a tough conference, on Grantland’s Lowe Post Podcast). Because the West has been stronger for a while now (in both the NHL and NBA), the teams that are missing the playoffs in the West are usually stronger than those missing in the East. Let’s use the Phoenix Suns as the example again. With 48 wins, the Suns really deserved to make the playoffs, but they didn’t because of their strong conference. In finishing out the playoffs, the Suns now get to draft 14th overall. The Raptors on the other hand, who had the same number of wins as Phoenix (but who were 3rd thanks to a poor conference and division), get the 20th pick. In other words, because the West is so strong, the teams that are missing the playoffs are actually getting to pick higher (and getting better) than they should be. Conversely, the East teams are not only weaker to begin with, they are getting even weaker by drafting from a less favourable position. It’s a vicious cycle that has no end in sight. With 1 through 16 seeding, that issue won’t exist anymore.
4. The opportunity for new rivalries. Heated rivalries are spawned through playoff battles. Red Wings-Avalanche, Bulls-Knicks, Spurs-Lakers, Habs-Bruins, Red Sox-Yankees, and so on. The Leafs and Habs are one of the oldest, but nowadays the rivalry isn’t as strong because they haven’t met in the playoffs since 1979. As it stands right now, there’s a very slim chance that, let’s say, Boston-Chicago would develop a strong (modern) rivalry. But had they met 4 or 5 times in a row in the playoffs, maybe they would have. Wouldn’t you like to see it anyway? Same with guys being traded away; we probably won’t get to see much of anything develop with Jason Spezza’s new team (whenever that comes) and the Senators, but if they could meet in the playoffs, it’d be so much fun. Just look at what this year’s matchups would have been in the first round of the NHL playoffs.

• 1. Boston Bruins vs. 16. Dallas Stars
• 2. Anaheim Ducks vs. 15. Detroit Red Wings
• 3. Colorado Avalanche vs. 14. Columbus Blue Jackets
• 4. St. Louis Blues vs. 13. Philadelphia Flyers
• 5. San Jose Sharks vs. 12. New York Rangers
• 6. Pittsburgh Penguins vs. 11. Minnesota Wild
• 7. Chicago Blackhawks vs. 10. Los Angeles Kings
• 8. Tampa Bay Lightning vs. 9. Montreal Canadiens

Some pretty cool stuff there, including the Tyler Seguin dynamic between the Bruins and Stars, the Tomas Hertl – Joe Thornton – 4 goals thing between the Sharks and Rangers, and of course the Hawks and Kings series (that would’ve come too soon in this case). And I want to think that St. Louis-Philadelphia could be a great matchup, with lots of bad blood, but we may never get to see it under the current format.

In the NBA, it looks like this

• 1. San Antonio Spurs vs. 16. Charlotte Bobcats
• 2. Oklahoma City Thunder vs. 15. Brooklyn Nets
• 3. Los Angeles Clippers vs. 14. Washington Wizards
• 4. Indiana Pacers vs. 13. Phoenix Suns
• 5. Miami Heat vs. 12. Chicago Bulls
• 6. Houston Rockets vs. 11. Toronto Raptors
• 7. Portland Trail Blazers vs. 10. Dallas Mavericks
• 8. Golden State Warriors vs. 9. Memphis Grizzlies

There may not be as many juicy matchups in the first round, but how about LeBron James and the Miami Heat needing to go through (potentially) the Bulls, Pacers, Thunder and Spurs to have a chance at a 3rd straight title (instead of the Bobcats and Nets in the first two rounds)? All the great matchups. What you lose in the first round, you gain in the next three.

It’s not perfect. Nothing is. This format is used in the QMJHL, and generally speaking, the first two rounds are a joke. Lots of sweeps. And although I can imagine the first rounds being less anticlimactic under this format as opposed to what they are now, I don’t think we’d see that level of unbalanced play at the pro level. The difference between best and worst playoff teams in the pros, especially the NHL (cough LA Kings 2012 coiugh) isn’t as significant as it is in junior. You’d still have competitive series.

And some people will point out that it would be unfair if we went to that current format with the current scheduling because you’d play some teams more than others, but I think it’s the opposite. The Phoenix Suns played the Western conference more than the teams in the East did, and they still wound up with as good of a record (or better) than all but 2 teams in the East. If anything, the unbalanced schedule makes it even more obvious that we need to go to this format. I’m way more impressed by the Suns 48-34 record than the Raptors or Bulls 48-34 record.

Again, it’s all about rewarding success and putting a better premium on the regular season. And as it stands right now, we’re not doing it properly.

The Resurgent Raptors

At the start of the season, I was the biggest enthusiast of the “Raptors should tank” movement. Just check the article I wrote less than 5 months ago, where I suggested the Raptors should basically do everything besides selling their soul in order to land a blue-chip prospect in the upcoming draft (specifically Andrew Wiggins).

But things change. And the dumbest thing for me to do would be to blindly stick to my guns without adapting to said changes. It’s not so much “jumping on the bandwagon” as it is a re-evaluation of the landscape, one now extremely favourable for the Raptors.

Maybe most experts didn’t expect Toronto to be 20-18 midway through January, but most of them didn’t see the Nets and Knicks start so poorly either. The Raptors have been given a grand opportunity to actually compete in the Eastern Conference, and they now have no reasonable choice but to pursue a playoff spot.

The current landscape

Let’s start with a look at the Eastern Conference itself, where the Raptors are currently third, a conference where only two teams (Miami Heat and Indiana Pacers) would currently be in a playoff position if they held the same record in the West.

1. Indiana Pacers (31-7)
2. Miami Heat (28-11)
3. Toronto Raptors (20-18)
4. Atlanta Hawks (20-19)
5. Washington Wizards (19-19)
6. Chicago Bulls (18-20)
7. Brooklyn Nets (16-22)
8. Charlotte Bobcats (17-24)
9. Detroit Pistons (16-23)
10. Cleveland Cavaliers (15-25)
11. New York Knicks (15-25)
12. Boston Celtics (14-27)
13. Philadelphia 76ers (13-26)
14. Orlando Magic (10-30)
15. Milwaukee Bucks (7-31)

Kind of sad. Only 5 teams are .500 or better. Of those 10 teams under .500, at least four of them are undoubtedly going for a high draft pick next year (Milwaukee, Orlando, Philadelphia, Boston) and three more might be going in the same direction depending on how things go in the next few weeks (Charlotte, Cleveland, and Chicago because of the Derrick Rose injury). Realistically, there aren’t any more than 10 teams trying to make the playoffs.

The only wrinkle for the Raptors might be that division rivals Brooklyn and New York, both of whom have had disappointing starts to the season to say the least, have no reason to tank because neither has a first round draft pick in 2014. There’s no doubt these two will be pushing Toronto all year, especially given the fact that neither is scared to spend money to make the necessary moves.

But as of right now, Toronto has clearly been better than both New York teams. It’s not just about the records, it’s about their play on the court. Sure, the Knicks or Nets might make a run, but who says the Raptors have hit their full stride either?  Toronto has had the toughest strength of schedule of any Eastern Conference team at .520 (Brooklyn is next at .509).

With 20 wins, the Raps are already too far behind on the “tank” game to catch up. At this point, it’s actually easier to make the playoffs than to get a high draft pick. If they try to tank, they’ll probably end up finishing 10th or 11th at worst, which is exactly what they wanted to avoid in the first place.

A reinvigorated team 

Since trading Rudy Gay on December 7th, the Raptors are 14-6, the best record in the Eastern Conference in that span. And that’s no coincidence. When you have a player shooting 38% while hoisting up 25+ shots per game, that can only have a negative effect on the team. It’s addition by subtraction. Not to mention that Toronto acquired four NBA-level depth players in John Salmons, Greivis Vasquez, Patrick Patterson, and Chuck Hayes, who give a much-needed boost to the team’s depth.

But more than that, the Raptors are playing like a team now. You never want to blame one player for the failure of an entire team, but it’s hard not to put two and two together in this case.The ball isn’t sticking like it did when Gay was with the team. Part of it might have been that players felt they could delegate to him and now have had to step up their game, part of it was that he was a redundancy and got in the way of other swing players like DeMar DeRozan and Terrence Ross.

Just look at this ball movement. Sure, it’s again the Bucks, but rarely did you ever see this with Rudy Gay on the floor.

Instead, you saw this.

Yup, that’s DeRozan doing his best Bo Jackson impersonation after Rudy Gay refuses to hand him the ball on the fast break.

The players know it too. In an interview with Zach Lowe of Grantland, DeMar DeRozan clearly confirmed what everyone knows has changed since the trade. “The ball is just constantly moving,” DeRozan says. “We don’t care who scores, or who shoots the ball. Masai [Ujiri, the team’s GM] made the best decision for us to win. You hate to see a close friend go, but he made a good decision. It’s paying off now.”

DeRozan himself has seen his assists per game jump from 2.7 to 4.6, but the biggest benefactor from the trade has been Kyle Lowry. Look at his average stats before and after the Gay trade.

BG : 14.3 points, 6.6 assists, 3.5 rebounds, 42.3% FG, 36.9% 3PT

AG : 17.9 points, 8.1 assists, 4.8 rebounds, 44.3% FG, 43.9% 3PT

Everything’s gone up. And that’s interesting, because figuring out what to do with Kyle Lowry is Masai Ujiri’s biggest decision moving towards the deadline. Speaking of…

The not-so-bleak outlook

Masai Ujiri has a really tough decision on his hands with the Lowry situation. There’s no doubt that he’s been a key factor in Toronto’s resurgence, to the point where it’ll be difficult to sell the fans on trading him now. If the Raps were truly committed to the tank (which the Rudy Gay trade was actually supposed to initiate), they should have dealt him right after the Gay trade to assure that this team would not get that much better. But a 14-6 record since has dictated that this team can (and should) compete for one of the top four seeds in the East.

That being said, there’s this thing called the future that MLSE has had a hard time understanding for a while now, and it would be refreshing to see it be addressed. Lowry is an unrestricted free agent at season’s end, and although he’s said he’s open to resigning with the team, he certainly hasn’t committed to resigning either. And this team can’t afford to let this guy walk. We’ve seen that story too often.

I think the Raptors need to make a push to resign him, even if they need to give him extended term. Some people might say he’s not an elite point guard, and that might me true, but that doesn’t mean you can’t win an NBA championship without one (might be getting ahead of ourselves, but that’s obviously the endgame here). Let’s just look at the starting point guards on the 5 last championship rosters.

• 2013 – Miami Heat – Mario Chalmers
• 2012 – Miami Heat – Mario Chalmers
• 2011 – Dallas Mavericks – Jason Kidd/Jason Terry/Jose Barea
• 2010 – Los Angeles Lakers – Derek Fisher
• 2009 – Los Angeles Lakers – Derek Fisher

None of those are elite point guard (Kidd and Terry were well past their time). What those teams did have was at least one superstar (LeBron and Wade for Miami, Nowitzki for Dallas, Kobe for Los Angeles). You can certainly argue that the Raptors don’t have a superstar, but who knows what DeRozan or (probably more likely) Valanciunas can turn into? Either way, Lowry has a good combination of passing ability, three point shooting and defense that makes him very useful for a potential championship team. Try to keep him.

For the first time in years, the Raps future doesn’t necessarily look bleak. DeRozan and Valanciunas look to be core pieces to build on. If they can get Lowry signed, they might be a few pieces away from a legitimate contender, at least for the next few years while Eastern Conference teams are still recovering from this year’s tank effort.

(And say what you want about him, but Drake is a legitimate asset for MLSE and the Toronto Raptors. If you don’t believe me, just ask newly acquired TFC striker Jermaine “Don’t Call Me Willem” Defoe how impactful Drake’s influence can be. He’s a mega-star in the hip-hop world, a world oft frequented by the men of basketball. I wouldn’t be surprised if he can lure a couple free agents to town).

Go for the playoffs. Try to make a run. God knows the franchise could use a playoff series win, having only one in its 19-year existence. All of a sudden, maybe luring free agents to town could become a bit easier. And instead of guys leaving to go elsewhere, they’d leave their current teams to come to Toronto.

Wouldn’t that be refreshing.

The Definitive Recast of Space Jam

Space Jam has always been an institution unto itself for me.

It’s out-of-this-world big, bigger than basketball, bigger than cartoons; it’s galactic.

Space Jam literally (and I don’t use that word lightly) combined the best of two worlds : the cartoon world, where the Looney Tunes are king, and the sports world, where Michael Jordan was (especially at the time) king. So many great elements: family-friendly comedy, high-profile cameos, and an impossibly fun comeback-infused high-profile sporting event. If this movie wasn’t legendary, why would Yahoo! have make a spoof of an ESPN 30-for-30 documentary detailing the incredible game that was the MonStars versus the Tune Squad.

If you haven’t seen Space Jam yet, please, for the love of Bill Murray, watch it now. There’s a link here where you can stream it online, works great.

I can’t count the amount of times I’ve seen the movie, and I never ever ever ever ever get tired of it (I actually have it playing again on my computer in the background as I write this). I don’t get tired of Lola Bunny, or of Wayne Knight “fixing a divot” in the green, or of those awkward couch interviews where the therapist tries to figure out why the NBA stars can’t play basketball anymore, or (especially) of Michael Jordan harnessing his inner Inspector Gadget to score that game-winning bucket. And you know what, I’m not even sorry if that was a spoiler for you. You should have seen the movie already. I gave you the opportunity to do so earlier anyway. But I digress.

Now, there are many examples of sequels that never should have been made, like Caddyshack 2, The Next Karate Kid or Batman & Robin; a sequel is generally never a good idea (I’m already scared that Anchorman 2 will fall disastrously short of the expectations set by the original). But, let’s not consider this a sequel, more of a remake. We’re trying to take what we had in Space Jam and translate it to today’s NBA.

That may sound challenging, but worry not, that’s what I’m here for.

I’m not the first person to think of this. In this article, Josh Klein tries to do the same thing as I’m about to do, which is to project the 6 NBA players (5 MonStars and one superhuman beast) that would be cast in the remake of this legendary movie. However, Josh Klein fails miserably at projecting his starting 5 MonStars for reasons I’ll explain later. So if anyone ever asks, nobody has ever accurately projected the cast of Space Jam 2. Until now.

The procedure

Just like your high school chemistry lab project, there is a certain procedure to follow. To correctly select the 6 players in this remake, we need to be faithful to the original cast, not only in what kind of players we use (in size and type) but how the teams were constructed. For the Tune Squad, that’s easier: it’s the Looney Tunes plus one near superhuman/generational NBA talent. We’ll get to that soon. The MonStars, though, is a bit more interesting. So let’s start with them.

The MonStars

The MonStars as a starting-5 are far from conventional. If you were an NBA team today and you had these five players as your starting-5, you wouldn’t necessarily win, and that’s the key in making this team. You don’t want the 5 best NBA players for this team, otherwise Michael Jordan and the Tune Squad would not have won. That’s a fact that I just made up.

The MonStars talents are taken from Muggsy Bogues, Larry Johnson, Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing and Shawn Bradley. That’s one point guard (Bogues), two power forwards (Johnson and Barkley) and two centers (Ewing and Bradley). Weird composition to a basketball squad, but I guess that’s what happens when your GM is also the chief moron of Moron Mountain (no, not Jerry Jones, I’m talking about the hell-like alien amusement park in the movie).

That’s where John Klein fails. On his team, he has Russell Westbrook, Kobe Bryant, Kevin Durant, Blake Griffin and Anthony Davis. Those players are too good, and they’re not even positionally faithful to the original five. That team probably wins against the Tune Squad too; that can’t happen.

So here’s my team, player-by-player. (Apparently every Monstar has a name, so we’ll learn those too).

Mugsy Bogues, aka Red Guy, aka Nawt : Nate Robinson

One of the easiest to pick. Just like Bogues, Robinson is one of the shortest guys in the NBA, has handles, and is irrationally confident. Robinson is also a great dunker (which makes him an ever better pick than Bogues). Great dunking, as we’ll see moving forward, is something that’ll carry over throughout this squad for the most part. The MonStars basically just dunked the whole game. (Apparently they didn’t learn anything in the “introduction to basketball” video that Bugs showed them).

And just like Robinson, Muggsy was never an all-star; he never averaged more than 10.8 points per game. He was a great passer however, something he has over Robinson, but otherwise they’re very similar. Plus, his name’s Nate, and the alien’s name is Nawt. That’s a sign.

Charles Barkley, aka Orange Guy, aka Pound : Zach Randolph

Remember, the MonStars don’t have a traditional lineup, so the Orange Guy is really the next shortest guy on the team.

For “Pound”, there’s one word that describes what you’re looking for most : intimidation. We’re talking physically and psychologically intimidating. The Orange Guy is the scariest, meanest and chunkiest guy on the team. So that means we need a scary, mean, chunky NBA player. Like Zach Randolph. Don’t take my word for it, just ask Jalen Rose, who ranks Randolph as the number one “dark-alley” player of all time, aka the guy you would never want to meet in a dark alley.

I think Z-Bo is a good fit here. He may big significantly taller than Sir Charles, but they’re both intimidating and both have the same low-post scoring proficiency. I’m pretty sure Barkley would be on Jalen’s 1990’s dark-alley team too.

Larry Johnson, aka Purple Guy, aka Bupkus : Blake Griffin

Tough one here. Larry Johnson was technically a stretch-four/small forward, but his alien counterpart is portrayed much more like Griffin; an athletic power forward that can dunk with the best of them. And if you were playing these 5 guys on the floor, you’d probably have Griffin at small forward because his athleticism would be too much to handle for the smaller wing players. You’re just going to lob it up to him anyway, it’s not like he has to create his own shot.

Griffin may be the player that least resembles his former NBA counterpart on this list, but if I had money on it, I’d bet that he’d be the first guy chosen for a Space Jam recast. His dunking ability and marketability are undeniable. With that in mind, Bupkus is his best fit.

Patrick Ewing, aka Green Guy, aka Bang : Anthony Davis

This is almost a homerun as far as resemblances between Ewing and Davis are concerned. Great young player? Check. Puts up 20+ points per game? Check. Great defender? Check. Just look at both of their Year 2 numbers (so far in Davis’ case).

Ewing : 21.8 pts, 8.8 rb, 1.7 ast, 2.4 blk, 1.4 stl, 50.3 FG%,

Davis : 20.9 pts, 11.0 rb, 1.5 ast, 3.6 blk, 2.1 stl, 48.4 FG%,

Those are very similar stat lines. I like my Green Guy tall and dominating, but he has to be a good dunker too and has to look somewhat like a dinosaur (I guess Chris Bosh would be a good candidate in that case, but Davis is too perfect). Plus, Anthony Davis kind of looks like Bang to begin with.

Notice how the alien actually has a unibrow. It’s green, so it doesn’t show as Davis’, but it’s there.

You know what, I’m starting the campaign now to officially have “Bang” as Anthony Davis’ (other) nickname. Just think of how cool it would be to have Mike Breen make one of his legendary calls on a great play by the Brow. Usually those are reserved for 3-pointers, but I’m sure he could use “bang!” to describe a great Anthony Davis dunk or block too. This has to happen. Now.

Shawn Bradley, aka Blue Guy, aka Blanko – Roy Hibbert

Unfortunately, Yao Ming isn’t in the league anymore to take this spot, so we have to settle with a guy who’s not quite as tall. Obviously the key with the Blue Guy is height. At 7’2″, Roy Hibbert is one of the 5 tallest guys in the NBA, and he’s 4 inches taller than anyone else on my team. Sure, “Blanko” is clearly a passively-aggressive racist name for the token white guy on the team, but I see past that.

Offensively, Hibbert is definitely a step above anything Bradley ever was, but defensively their games are similar. And again, all Hibbert (or Blanko) is doing in the movie is dunk anyway, so it doesn’t matter much. Hibbert meets the height and defensive requirements, so he’s in.

The Tune Squad

Obviously most of the Tune Squad remains intact. We’re not getting rid of Bugs, or Daffy, or Elmer Fudd, or any of the Looneys. That’s just not happening. True story, Looney Tunes don’t grow older; they’re eternally the same. That’s why Bugs Bunny, to this day, is the 9th most portrayed film-personality in the world.

But there’s obviously one piece missing, and that’s the superstar-level NBA talent needed to lead this team to victory. And I don’t care how many people are whispering that Michael Jordan might be looking to come back to the NBA for one game, he’s in no shape to lead the Tune Squad to victory like he did over 15 years ago.

We need a current superstar. A physical and mental freak of nature, a man whose all-around NBA talents cannot be matched, and the only current player who would have a realistic shot of leading this team to victory (and yes, I get that “realistic” might not be the appropriate word given the cartoon-universe setting).

Michael Jordan, aka Generational Talent – LeBron James 

Come on, there was never really any doubt here. Sure, you can talk about how good Kevin Durant, Kobe Bryant, Derrick Rose, Chris Paul or any other of the NBA’s superstars are, but no one can match LeBron right now. He’s at the peak of his powers, and he can do everything.

Plus, as far as will-to-win/work-ethic/alpha-dog mentality are concerned, he’s the only player in the NBA that can compare to Jordan and handle the load of carrying the team on his (very wide) shoulders. And don’t worry, the real LeBron James woudn’t quit on the Tune Squad like the College Humour version of him did. No, he’d do what he did against the Celtics in Game 6 of the East Finals in 2012 (45 pts-15 rebs-5 asts), or against the Pistons in Game 7 of the East Finals in 2007 (25 consecutive points for his team, 48 overall) : everything his team needed him to do to win.

Plus, LEBRON JAMES WANTS TO DO THIS! HE WANTS BE THE MJ OF SPACE JAM 2, HE SAID SO!

RT @Parletoo: @KingJames do you love space Jam ?(I love that movie. Wish I could do Space Jam 2!)

— LeBron James (@KingJames) August 26, 2012

See! LeBron wants Space Jam 2, and Space Jam 2 surely wants LeBron.

There’s nothing more to say.

2013-2014 NBA Preview

It’s time for some basketball! Opening tip-off is tomorrow night, and it’s the start of an 8-month journey to crown a champion. A lot of pressing questions are going to be answered. Will the Heat three-peat? Will Derrick Rose return to MVP form with the Bulls? Can the Spurs bounce back from their devastating loss in the 2013 NBA Finals? When will Kobe return? Do the Clippers make the jump under new head coach Doc Rivers?

I don’t have answers to these questions just yet, but what I can do is offer my power rankings, from 30 to 1. I’ve also taken the opportunity to throw in some of my favourite GIFs from last season. Here we go.

Rebuild Mode

30) Philadelphia 76ers; 29) Phoenix Suns; 28) Orlando Magic; 27) Boston Celtics; 26) Sacramento Kings; 25) Utah Jazz; 24) Charlotte Bobcats.

This is the Riggin’ for Wiggins group, probably as crowded of a group of “rebuilding” teams as we’ve seen in recent memory. That’s probably due to the strength of the 2014 draft, which is being hyped as one of the best in the past decade. Along with Andrew Wiggins, there are up to 8 potential future all-stars according to ESPN insider Chad Ford.

Besides the lottery, it’ll be interesting to see which players from this group are traded. Guys like Rajon Rondo and Jeff Green in Boston, Spencer Hawes in Philly, Emeka Okafor in Phoenix (who was just acquired from Washington) and Aaron Afflalo in Orlando are all players to keep an eye on. Otherwise, not much to look forward to for this group in 2013-2014. Except maybe Kris Humphries becoming the first player to be rejected by a referee with two different teams, now that he’s in Bean-town.

Outside Looking In

23) Los Angeles Lakers

This is one of the biggest wildcard rankings, because it depends a lot on Kobe Bryant. I mean, it usually does anyway, but right now the Black Mamba is recovering from his torn achilles, and we’re still not sure when he’ll be back. He could come back in mid-October, just like he could come back in December. But even with Kobe, there isn’t much talent after him and Pau Gasol. Plus, Mike d’Antoni is still the coach somehow. I can’t see them making the playoffs either way.

What do you think about this upcoming season, Kobe?

22) Milwaukee Bucks

21) Toronto Raptors

I’ve written about this before, but I really think the Raptors are attacking this season with the wrong mindset. This isn’t a team that can contend, far from it. Best case scenario, they make the playoffs with the 7th or 8th seed and get swept in the 1st round by the Heat, Pacers or Bulls. Worst case scenario, they finish 9th, don’t make the trades they need to (cough Rudy Gay cough), get a mid-round draft pick and stay mediocre for years to come. I think Jonas Valanciunas is going to be one of the best centers in the league eventually, just not right now. Toronto should take its lumps this year, pick up some important pieces, and go for it in the future. But the way the team is set up right now, I’m scared that the Raps are headed for the worst case 9th-place finish.

20) New Orleans Pelicans, 19) Washington Wizards, 18)  Portland Trail Blazers

This is an interesting little trio of teams, all relatively young squads that have shown flashes of being good. They also each have a young soon-to-be star (Anthony Davis with the Pelicans, John Wall with the Wizards, Damien Lillard with the Blazers) who could make a big jump this year. If they do, it wouldn’t be surprising to see any of these teams in the playoffs.

17) Dallas Mavericks

We could be in store for a big year from Dirk after a year in which he struggled with injuries. If that’s the case, watch out, the Mavs might just be a lot better than some people think. The trio of Jose Calderon, Monta Ellis and Nowitzki could actually be very good (on offense anyway).

Playoff bound

16) Atlanta Hawks

15) Cleveland Cavaliers; 14) Minnesota Timberwolves 13) Detroit Pistons

Three teams on the upswing here. For Cleveland, a lot will depend on what they can get from Andrew Bynum. We know Kyrie Irving is a stud, but that’s a young lineup that could use some big minutes from a guy who’s already been there (say what you will, but Bynum was part of 2 Lakers championships). In Minnesota, the key thing will be keeping Ricky Rubio and Kevin Love together healthy, whereas Detroit’s big question is how the frontcourt of Greg Monroe, Andre Drummond and Josh Smith will work.

12) Denver Nuggets

11) New York Knicks

10) Memphis Grizzlies

On the other hand, these are three teams that could take a slight step back from last year. Denver lost Andre Iguodala to the Warriors and will be without one of their best scorers in Danilo Gallinari for a while as he’s recovering from a torn ACL, not to mention they lost last year’s Coach of the year (George Karl) to retirement and Executive of the year (Masai Ujiri) who left for Toronto. But the Nuggets are fun, and they have great celebrations, like this Italian one!

And this one, where Javale McGee is cooking something delicious.

In New York, the Knicks lineup doesn’t look like it’ll be able to get very many stops, especially if they decide to play Amar’e Stoudemire and Andrea Bargnani together. Teams like the Bulls, Cavs, Wizards and Pistons have all improved, so that’s going to take wins away from New York.

Similar idea in the West, the top teams improved, while the Grizzlies haven’t done anything to shore up the lack of scoring aside from Zach Randolf and Marc Gasol.

True contenders

9) Golden State Warriors

One of the funnest teams in the league. Steph Curry is ready to become a superstar, Andrew Bogut is healthy, and Andre Iguodala adds much-needed perimeter defence. Plus, the whole yellow thing in the arena is awesome. They’re fun to watch on many levels. Hopefully Steph will give more love to his teammates this year though.

8) Brooklyn Nets; 7) Houston Rockets

Two of the big movers in the offseason, both in terms of actual players and title hopes. The Nets, of course, made a big splash at the trade deadline, landing Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce in a massive trade, making their starting lineup one of the highest-paid in NBA history. (The NBA would be so much fun if every team was owned by a Russian billionaire who didn’t care how many millions he had to pay in luxury taxes).

Houston, on the other hand, landed the biggest fish in the free agent pond when they lured Dwight Howard away from the Lakers (although, admittedly, it didn’t take much convincing to get Howard out of LA). Getting the best center in the league to play with the best 2-guard in the league in James Harden (until Kobe Bryant gets back at least) suddenly makes the Rockets a nice bet to compete for the West title.

6) Oklahoma City Thunder; 5) San Antonio Spurs; 4) Indiana Pacers; 3) Chicago Bulls

All of these teams have a very legitimate shot of winning the title. They all have their weaknesses, but their strengths are too great to ignore. Kevin Durant is the best pure scorer in the league, but the questions for OKC are Russell Westbrook’s health and depth scoring. For the Spurs, it’s always tough to bet against Tim Duncan, Tony Parker and Gregg Popovich, but age and mileage might start to take their toll on the club. Plus, who knows what effect the devastating loss to Miami will have on the team’s psyche. No matter how strong you are mentally, it’s tough to get this out of your head.

Over in the East, the Pacers showed they can keep up with the Heat last year, and they’ve improved that team for this year with the acquisition of Luis Scola and the return of Danny Granger. The Bulls are getting Derrick Rose back, and they have as good a five-man defensive unit as any in the league. But the question for both Chicago and Indiana is finding a way to contain LeBron, because nobody in the East has been able to in the past 3 years. Nobody is questioning either team’s physicality, however.

2) Los Angeles Clippers

Take one of the most explosive, high-tempo offenses in the league, add in some good shooters and you have what should be the best scoring unit in the league. As Grantland writer Zach Lowe explains in this column, “they’ve got killer shooting in J.J. Redick and Jared Dudley to dot the floor around Chris Paul–Griffin pick-and-rolls, and above Griffin post-ups.” Deadly. Matt Barnes is a solid defender, but they should add another by trading away Jamal Crawford. Otherwise, they might be exposed once again in the playoffs.

Oh, and they’re always good for a few spectacular dunks every game. And not just Blake Griffin.

1) Miami Heat

It’s just too hard to bet against LeBron James. Dwyane Wade looks like he’s getting a bit more healthy, and they still have most of the same pieces that helped them win two consecutive titles. And look for Greg Oden to rejuvenate his career with the Heat; Miami already kind of did the same with the Birdman, Chris Andersen, so why not Oden? If there’s one team that can do just that, it’s the defending champions.

And even if Oden doesn’t pan out, LeBron can will a championship by himself. He knows what a three-peat would mean to his legacy. He’s always comparing himself to MJ, and a three-peat is a big part of that. Don’t forget that all 3 guys from the Big-3 are in contract years this year; that’s a big deal.

That’s why I see the Heat three-peating, beating the Clippers in 7 games and winning the 2014 NBA Finals.

Which, of course, means more of my favourite version of LeBron: the “go ahead and hate, I’m the King” Lebron.

The Right Moves At The Wrong Time

The Toronto Raptors are aiming to be better this year. In doing so, they may be ruining their chance to draft the player that could turn their franchise around.

Picture this: you’re standing in line to go to the bathroom at a major sporting event or rock concert. It’s a long line; it’ll probably take about 30 minutes before you can relieve yourself, but you’ve got to go, so you just suck it up and get in line.

You’re moving along, slowly but surely, and you’re getting more and more anxious to settle your business.

Finally, there’s only one person in front of you, and he goes in. You’re next.

And that’s when you suddenly decide that you’ve waited too long. You change your mind, get out of the line and think to yourself that you’ll deal with the consequences later on.

Sounds like a pretty dumb decision, considering the circumstances, right? Who would make such an incompetent move?

Ladies and gentleman, I present you the 2013-2014 Toronto Raptors.

Before I get started, let me say this: I think Masai Ujiri is a great GM (but don’t take my word for it, just ask his colleagues who voted him as best executive in the NBA last year for his work in Denver). I love the Bargnani trade in theory (I’ll get to that later), Ujiri’s first significant move; I still think Knicks GM Glen Grunwald meant to trade Steve Novak, Marcus Camby, Quentin Richardson and three “basketballs” for Andrea, not three “drafts picks”.  I think Tim Leiweke will be very capable in his new role as president and CEO of MLSE. They added DJ Augustin and Tyler Hansborough to bolster their bench. All this to say, the Raptors made some good basketball moves this offseason that should improve their team for next year.

And that’s the problem.

It’s not really a secret that the Toronto Raptors have been bad for a long time. Since they’ve entered the league in 1995, they have a .407 winning percentage, which includes only four winning seasons and a franchise high of 47 wins. They have 5 playoff appearances, but have only one playoff series victory. To put things in another perspective, Phil Jackson has as many rings as a coach (yes, NBA championship titles) as the Raptors franchise has playoff wins (yes, single game victories): 11.

They’ve been a bad franchise since Day 1, so why stop now, especially given what one more year of bad could’ve brought them?

If you haven’t heard by now, the 2014 NBA Draft class is loaded. Comparisons are already being made to the once-in-a-generation 2003 Draft that included LeBron, Carmelo, Wade and Bosh, to name a few, while some are talking about it as possibly the best draft ever.

Now I suppose with the current talent level on the team, the Raps should find themselves drafting somewhere between 6th and 12th. If this is such a good class, they should still be able to get a good, if not very good NBA player. I get that.

But good (or very good) isn’t good enough.

Projected to be the #1 overall pick in next year’s draft is a Canadian (for the second year in a row, I might add) that you might have heard of named Andrew Wiggins. If you haven’t heard of him, he was named the best highschool basketball player in the United States last year, an amazing athlete who is drawing comparisons to guys like Kevin Durant, Tracy McGrady and Dominique Wilkins.

He could very well be a franchise player. And no team needs to be that franchise quite like the Toronto Raptors do.

To be honest, the Raptors have a lot of needs, and not just as it relates to their rotation. They need to change their culture and their whole image. Start from scratch. Get rid of the Raptors nickname and go with the Huskies (the first professional basketball team in Toronto that played one season in the Basketball Association of America back in 1946-1947). That allows you to follow the rest of the city’s sports teams and go blue. (In case you’re wondering, Tim Leiweke is already talking about a rebrand, so all of this is very realistic). When your franchise’s biggest moments are a 2nd round series and Vince Carter’s epic dunk contest destruction, it’s ok to move on. It’s not like they’d be throwing away years of winning memories. Start fresh from scratch with a new image to attract a whole new generation of fans.

And who better to build this new brand around then a humble, hard-working Canadian who happens to be reeeeeally good at basketball?

I’m telling you, the Raptors need Andrew Wiggins badly, as badly as the Los Angeles Clippers needed Blake Griffin. Say what you want about Blake’s poor shooting or perceived softness, but he siinglehandedly changed that franchise around. Without him (and some help from our favorite retiring commish, David Stern), the Clippers never get Chris Paul, one of the best point guards in the league. And if that doesn’t happen, they certainly don’t get Doc Rivers, one of the best coaches in the league.

That’s the kind of guy the Raptors need, not only a great player, but someone who can change the image of the franchise enough so that free agents might actually want to go there someday.

Which brings us back to the current Raptors, who are far from a prestigious free agent destination and who look like they’re set to finish 2013-2014 in that hated twilight zone of mediocrity. (Look, I’m a Leafs fan, I know all about it). Their projected starting five looks like this:

1 – Kyle Lowry, a good one-guard who’s probably among the league’s 12 best point guards or so.

2 – DeMar DeRozan, a guy who can dunk a lot and score the odd 20 points, but who isn’t really a reliable offensive player (yet, anyway).

3 – Rudy Gay, the most overrated/underrated player in the league, depending who you ask. Sure he can make the odd shot, but he isn’t a scorer, he’s a shooter (and not a very good one, if his metric stats are any indication).

4,5 – Amir Johnson and Jonas Valanciunas, two young big men who are still developing. For what it’s worth, Valanciunas recently won the summer league MVP award, so the Raptors are hoping that he’s going to be a good player for years to come, and he better, considering that Toronto could’ve given him up to get James Freaking Harden last summer, but let’s not dwell on the past. (And I know that it’s very Raptorsy to hang your hat on summer league accomplishments, but the competition there is pretty strong and the award has been won by guys like Blake Griffin, John Wall and Damien Lillard, so it’s not nothing).

Add in a mediocre bench with guys like Terrence Ross, Landry Fields and the aforementioned Novak, Augustin and Hansborough, and you’ve got yourself a fine 10th place team right there.

Now if a lot goes right as far as player development and pure luck, they might be able to turn that into a 7th or 8th seed. And then the excitement will last for exactly 4 games as Toronto gets swept by one of the East’s powerhouses like the Heat, the Pacers, or the Bulls.

That’s the ultimate goal here? A playoff spot that’ll most likely garner zero wins? That doesn’t sound great to me, especially when it’s sacrificing the chance to get a franchise guy THAT ACTUALLY WANTS TO PLAY FOR YOUR TEAM. Sure, you can try trading for him, but it’ll be nearly impossible to get the #1 overall pick away from whatever team tanked best (and even then, if you need to trade your entire squad, I say do it).

I know Masai Ujiri and Dwayne Casey are going to try to do the best job that they can to win basketball games this season, but I wish they didn’t. Here’s what they really should’ve to make a run at Andrew Wiggins (and besides #1, they can still be done):

1. Keep Andrea Bargnani, and play him as much as possible. Actually, play him point guard. We’re trying to lose here. If you think that I’m cheating, just look at the Orlando Magic who are talking about putting Victor Oladipo, who isn’t a point guard, at point guard. They understand the Wiggins game.

2. Change your rotations early and often so that nobody gets into a rhythm and/or develops good chemistry.

3. Try to give a heavy workload to Kyle Lowry early on so that he develops nagging injuries that limit him. Wait, nevermind, that’ll take care of itself.

4. Give Rudy Gay a whole bunch of looks early in the season to see if his corrected vision changes anything in his game. If it does, trade him for expiring contracts and draft picks. If it doesn’t, keep letting him shoot his mediocre shooting percentages. (If you’re too lazy to click on that link, know this: for all the talk of Rudy Gay being a shooter, he ranked 38th out of 40 in eFG% for players who took at least 1000 shots last year. That’s a fancy metric way of saying that, of the guys whose teams relied upon to shoot the ball a lot, only two were less effective than Rudy Gay: Monta Ellis and Evan Turner. Just above Rudy Gay at 37th? DeMar DeRozan).

Ok, I may have gone overboard with a few of those suggestions (you get to decide which) but you get the idea. You know when coaches talk about “focusing on the process” (which is another way of saying “our team isn’t good so we can’t expect to win games”)? That’s what the Raptors should be doing this year, focusing on the process (of getting Andrew Wiggins).

If none of this has convinced you that the Toronto Raptors should’ve tried to be bad this year, keep this in mind: as one of my favorite NBA writers Zach Lowe writes, the Charlotte Bobcats, who have been even worse than the Raptors since they joined the league in 2003, have made a few offseason moves that, like the Raptors, should bump them up to around 10th in the East. That should throw red flags enough for you. History has shown us that if the Charlotte Bobcats are doing something, it probably isn’t the right thing to do. So if the Charlotte Bobcats think this is the year to try to be good, it most certainly isn’t. (If I can’t convince you there, I have nothing else).

So when you watch the Toronto Raptors this year as they battle for one of the bottom playoff seeds, just remember that they could’ve done the right thing for the long-term and aim for Andrew Wiggins. They were almost there.

But they felt that they had been waiting too long, and got out of the line. And that means no relief for Raptors fans anytime soon.

Data from basketball-reference.com was used to research this article.