2014-2015 NHL PREVIEW

Finally. Welcome back to hockey, everyone.

The last time we saw some meaningful puck, Alec Martinez, everyone’s favorite Spanish-American (who grew up in Michigan and California), lifted the Kings to their second Stanley Cup in 3 years with possibly the easiest overtime goal in the history of hockey.

Stick on the ice, kids.

And if that last word of Canadiana advice made you think about him again, yes, Don Cherry is back on TV for the foreseeable future, as part of the Rogers mega-team that includes most of the CBC crew as well as a few Anakin Skywalkers from TSN. And sure, Cherry has never been one to be into the bells and whistles, but boy does Rogers have some toys to work with in their new Death Star of a studio.

Just look at that cool magic puck thingy at #3 that does everything Artoo can do and more.

If you haven’t figured it out by now, Rogers is the Sith. (Spelling is key folks). But no matter the new platform, the game is still the same. And there’s a lot to get to, so let’s get to it.

Here’s what you’ll find here. All teams ranked from 30 to 1 going into the season, divided into five (uneven) groups : The Basement, Outside Looking In, The Bubble, Playoff Bound, and Legit Contenders. For every team, you’ll get a Trending status, Reasons for Hope, Reasons for Doubt, the FPR Spotlight Player (for a full explanation on FPR, click here, and for the purpose of this article, players have to have played a minimum of 40 games last year), and finally a Slightly Appropriate GIF. Enjoy!

THE BASEMENT

30. Buffalo Sabres

Trending : Slightly up.

Reasons for Hope : The talent level on this team is slightly better than dreadful (which it was last year) with the acquisition of Matt Moulson, Brian Gionta and Josh Gorges. Plus, Ted Nolan is too prideful to not put up a fight no matter what he has on his roster. This is a guy that went to coach in Latvia for goodness sakes. But more importantly, Connor McDavid and Jake Eichel are both potential franchise changing players who are draft eligible in 2015.

Reasons for Doubt : Matt Moulson, Brian Gionta and Josh Gorges don’t make you go from the league’s worst to a playoff team. The Sabres were in the bottom 10 in both powerplay and penalty kill last year, gave up a ton of shots on goal, and were overmatched in almost all areas of the game. The team is slightly better, but nowhere near good enough to compete, even in the East.

FPR Spotlight Player : This part of the preview would generally be where I highlight a forward whose production has been undervalued, but given that Andrej Sekera (a defenceman) led the team in FPR at 4.42, that’s not really possible. Sekera is a decent player but still isn’t that productive, even for defencemen. And it’s really hard for D-men to crack this rating system given that it’s more geared towards forwards. Just goes to show how terrible this team was last year. Only one other club was led in FPR by a blueliner; spoiler alert, that team doesn’t is pretty low in these rankings as well.

Slighlty Appropriate GIF :

Yes, that’s former NHLer turned Swiss Leaguer Paul Ranger with the kicking-the-stick shootout attempt. You know life as a Sabre is embarassing when Paul Ranger trolls you.

29. Carolina Hurricanes 

Trending : Way down.

Reasons for Hope : Anton Khudobin is actually one of only three goalies in the NHL to have played at least 50 games while recording at least a .925 save percentage and 2.25 goals against average. The other two are Cory Schneider and Tuukka Rask. That’s good company. If Khudobin gets the majority of starts (which isn’t guaranteed), he might be able to lift the Canes to mediocrity (which is not bad in the East).

Reasons for Doubt : With Jordan Staal out for at least 3 months with a broken leg, Carolina’s depth chart down the middle is depleted, not to mention that brother Eric just recovered from a “core muscle injury”. So the Canes are currently rolling with Staal, Nathan Gerbe, Jay McClement and Riley Nash at center. Ouch. Plus, Jeff Skinner has missed the start of the season with a concussion, further crippling the top-6. Not good.

FPR Spotlight Player : In his first year of a big contract extension, Alex Semin was extremely productive with the Canes. At 8.70, Semin’s FPR ranks him ahead of the likes of Patrick Kane, David Backes and Jordan Eberle. It’s easy to typecast Semin as an offensive player who floats in and out of games, but last year his Relative Corsi was better than Sidney Crosby’s and Anze Kopitar’s.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

Life without one of the bros on the ice will be tough to watch.

28. Ottawa Senators 

Trending: Down.

Reasons for Hope : Obviously the Sens are hoping that the big contract and the big letter they gave to Bobby Ryan and Erik Karlsson, respectively, only further motivate them to improve their already solid play. Plus, just when you think you have the Senators figured out, you’re usually wrong. Three years ago, most people had them pegged as a bottom-feeder, and they squeaked into the playoffs. #PeskySens became a thing and the legend of Paul Maclean was born. The next year, many expected a slight regression, but they made it to the 2nd round of the playoffs. Last year, many had them winning the division, and they missed the playoffs. So I guess they’re winning the conference this year?

Reasons for Doubt : The depth is certainly an issue. Although the Jason Spezza trade is a solid one for the future in my mind, it doesn’t do much in the short-term. Ottawa has some glaring holes, notably at center and in the bottom six. Plus, even when Robin Lehner and Craig Anderson were healthy last year, they were unimpressive to say the least, whereas goaltending had been the backbone of this team in the few years prior.

FPR Spotlight Player : Long recognized as a darling of advanced metrics, Clarke MacArthur took another step forward last year with career highs in goals (24) and plus-minus (+14). At 8.73, MacArthur’s FPR puts him right alongside Semin.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

“Here’s the captaincy Erik. There you go”. “Thanks! Wait, what? Hang on, Jason! Come back!”

27. Winnipeg Jets 

Trending : Even.

Reasons for Hope : I do like some of the pieces moving forward. Mark Scheifele and Jacob Trouba will eventually form a true stud cente – stud D-man duo. That’s the start of a real good foundation for any club (the only missing ingredient being a stud goalie). I think Evander Kane continues to be undermined in that market, but he’s either a solid contributor or a great trade asset. And putting Dustin Byfuglien up front should help the overall team play.

Reasons for Doubt : Two things need to change for this team to have any chance in the West (and they’re linked to some extent). One, the Jets need a goalie. Ondrej Pavelec is the worst starter in the NHL by any measurable, whether it be statistical or anecdotal. Of the 29 goalies who played in at least 29 games last year, Pavelec had the worst save percentage of all of them. And the gap between Pavelec’s save percentage and Evgeni Nabokov’s (.910) was the biggest between any two goalies on that list. Two, until the Jets really become the Jets (and not just the Winnipeg Thrashers), this team isn’t going anywhere.

FPR Player Spotlight : Despite what I just finished saying about the Jets needing to cut ties with the former Thrashers, former Thrasher Bryan Little had a great season last year. Little scored a career high 64 points last year (13 more than his previous high with Atlanta in ’08-’09). At 9.70, his FPR was more than a full point higher than the next best Jet (Andrew Ladd).

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

This is what it feels like to have Ondrej Pavelec in net.

26. Calgary Flames 

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : This team might have struggled to win games last year, but man did they battle. And that’s a healthy mindset that stays with a team, especially when the main leadership core stays intact (which it has). And adding a competent NHL goalie in Jonas Hiller can only help. Plus, with Sean Monahan, Mikael Backlund, Johnny Gaudreau and now Sam Bennett, the Flames are building up a solid forward nucleus. This team will be good in a few years.

Reasons for Doubt : Calgary is still pretty raw up front, and lacks depth on the back end after Mark Giordano and Dennis Wideman. The Flames were bottom 10 in both goals scored and allowed last year, and I don’t see it getting that much better on either end. If anything, losing third-leading scorer Mike Cammalleri and effectively replacing him with Mason Raymond is certainly a downgrade on offense.

FPR Spotlight Player : I mentioned with the Sabres that Andrej Sekera was one of only two defenceman to lead his club in FPR. The other? Calgary captain Mark Giordano, who was actually a solid 56th overall in FPR rankings at 8.59, just ahead of Patrick Kane (8.56). Giordano was second in assists (33) and points (47) among all Flames players, all the while recording an impressive +12 on a struggling club. Add in his reliable defensive play, and you understand why Giordano was in the conversation to make Canada’s Olympic squad.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

The Flames might not be a powerhouse, but they’re feisty.

25. Nashville Predators

Trending : Still down.

Reasons for Hope : Seth Jones was a solid player last year, and he has the tools to become a stud (breaking news). With perennial Norris candidate Shea Weber and rising star Roman Josi also on the blueline, and a healthy Pekka Rinne in goal, there’s no doubt that defensive play has to be the backbone of this club. Adding a proven scorer like James Neal might help bump the powerplay up a few notches as well.

Reasons for Doubt : The theme continues with these bottom clubs and center depth. Olli Jokinen, Mike Ribeiro, Colin Wilson, Filip Forsberg, and Mike Fisher (when he comes back) are all decent NHLers, but none of them should be counted on to go up against the outstanding center depth in the Western conference, and that’s what’s going to happen. Jokinen, Ribeiro and Neal should all help the offense, but man does it need help. Aside from those guys, Craig Smith is the forward to have recorded a 20-goal season in his career.

FPR Spotlight Player : And that 20-goal season for Craig Smith? Last year! He was actually a solid producer, ranking in the top 50 in FPR (9.02), scoring 24 goals and 52 points. Decent, considering he didn’t have much help.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

Take a nap, folks. Or change the channel.

OUTSIDE LOOKING IN 

24. Arizona Cardinals 

Trending : Slightly down.

Reasons for Hope : Oliver Ekmann-Larsson is probably one of the most underrated defencemen in the league, if only because of where he plays, and Mike Smith should be able to further utilize his puck handling skills (and diving skills) with the extended trapezoid. The Coyotes are the Nashville Predators of the Pacific, managing to be competitive year in, year out despite their obvious lack of talent. Remember when the Yotes made the Conference Finals in 2012? That team wasn’t really that much better than this one. And the new name should reinvigorate the club.

Reasons for Doubt : …but I don’t really dig the new name. I understand that the Coyotes may as well try to extend their market reach as far as possible, but I’m generally against teams using a state as their location name. Florida? Just call it Sunrise. (How cool are the Sunrise Panthers, seriously?). But as far as the actual roster goes, there’s reason to believe that they won’t have the 4th best powerplay again (that was actually a thing that existed), especially with the loss of Radim Vrbata and Mike Ribeiro.

FPR Spotlight Player : Remember when Martin Erat was relegated to the press box and Washington and reluctantly traded him to the Coyotes? Well, somehow he ended up leading the (remaining) Phoenix Arizona players in FPR…at 4.88. (If you’re wondering, that’s on par with guys like Benoit Pouliot and Gabriel Bourque). The next closest were Rob Klinkhammer, currently listed as the team’s 4th line centre, and Shane Doan. Looking at all the numbers, I’m befuddled as to how the Coyotes were anywhere close to a playoff spot, but it looks like Erat might help out heir production with the departure of Vrbata.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

“That’s Arizona Coyotes to you”.

23. Florida Panthers

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : First overall pick Aaron Ekblad is not too far away from being a stalwart on the blueline in the NHL, while Jonathan Huberdeau and Aleksander Barkov offer a solid one-two punch offensively moving forward. Plus, a full season from Roberto Luongo in net can’t hurt. And despite the fact that all the money thrown around doesn’t amount to a huge upgrade, the addition of guys like Dave Bolland and Shawn Thornton should only improve Florida’s last ranked penalty kill. (They were also dead last in powerplay percentage as well, so there’s only one way to go there too).

Reasons for Doubt : The last time the Panthers spent a bunch of money on average NHLers (in 2011 to guys like Sean Bergenheim, Tomas Fleischmann, and Ed Jovanovski), they made the playoffs, yes, but in hindsight it was only a mirage; Florida won the division despite winning only 38 games (3 more than 13th place Toronto), recording 18 overtime and shootout losses that helped them pretend to be a playoff team (they lost to the Devils in the first round). That ended up stunting their growth, as Florida has finished last and second last in the East since. You can’t cheat a rebuild.

FPR Spotlight Player : He’s far from a star producer, but Scottie Upshall recorded career-highs in assists (22) and points (37) last year…in his 12th season! Good for him. Add in a decent Relative Corsi rating (4.7) and the fact that the Panthers were a full goal per game better when Upshall was on the ice, and you get yourself a solid 6.25 FPR. Maybe last year was the outlier, but it was a fun outlier at the very least.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

The Cats are coming.

22. New Jersey Devils

Trending : Even

Reasons for Hope : Cory Schneider has proven throughout his career that he’s a great goaltender, so the fact that he won’t be splitting starts with Marty Brodeur is a big plus. And the Devils have a whole bunch of household names on their roster (Jagr, Elias, Cammalleri, Ruutu, Havlat, Ryder); most of them are well past their prime, but there’s something to be said for experience I guess. This team will do the opposite of outscore you. They’ll out-defend you and out-trap you.

Reasons for Doubt : This sorta-kinda feels like the post-lockout Leafs (from like 2006 to 2010), no? Basically a retirement home for bordeline, washed up NHLers. Obvisouly a few notable differences, like the fact that Cory Schneider is infinity times better than Vesa Toskala or Andrew Raycroft or Justin Pogge or Mikael Tellqvist (I mean ewwww), and that Tomas Kaberle couldn’t make the Devils this season. But you would hope by now that Adam Henrique would have become a stud center, and that has not been the case. Which leaves the Devils scrambling for stop-gaps every year.

FPR Spotlight Player : I spoke about washed up guys, but Jaromir Jagr isn’t that (still), at least from a production standpoint. Jagr scored 67 points last year, his best NHL output since 07-08, which lifted him to a 12.14 FPR, by far the best on the Devils (Travis Zajac was next at 6.06), and better than the likes of Jonathan Toews, Chris Kunitz and Joe Pavelski. He’s still a fun player to watch.

Slightly Appropriate GIF : http://nesncom.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/854298135.gif?w=500&h=279

Most of the guys on this team are in the “get off my lawn” stage of their career.

21. Edmonton Oilers 

Trending : Barely up.

Reasons for Hope : Hope itself, in a sense. We’re still expecting that “next step”, especially from Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Nail Yakupov and Justin Schultz, and it’s hard to imagine that they’re anywhere close from having stopped improving. They may all be upended by Leon Draisaitl, who had a great camp and has already jumped to the 2nd center spot. Goaltending and defence was also a big issue last year (and years past), and despite the fact that they’re not world-beaters, Viktor Fasth, Ben Scrivens and Mark Fayne are all upgrades to the roster.

Reasons for Doubt : That said, the West is so good, and their roster is still overmatched in relation to the legit contenders. Keep in mind that the Oilers could improve by 20 points this year (a substantial jump) and still only have 87 points overall (which would have been 4 shy of a playoff spot). It’s hard to say that they’re getting closer when they keep finishing last. But the biggest reason for doubt in my books is Ryan Nugent-Hopkins. There’s fear there that he’ll never be close to what he was projected to be because of his size and durability.

FPR Spotlight Player : I really liked the trade for David Perron last year, and I still do today. Perron had a solid year production-wise, as his 7.58 FPR puts him right alongside Martin St. Louis and and T.J. Oshie. Career-highs in goals (28) and points (57), which is solid production from a 2nd line player. I think he’s done well to justify the trade so far.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

The Oilers are sooo close to making that next step though.

20. Philadelphia Flyers

Trending : Down.

Reasons for Hope : This team was definitely carried by its offense (3rd best scoring team in the East) and special teams (top-8 in both PP and PK), and the Flyers still have most of the pieces to continue that success this season. The depth down the middle is solid, with Claude Giroux, Sean Couturier, Brayden Schenn and Vinny Lecavalier. There are no studs on D, but there are 6 quality blueliners that give Philly some solid versatility.

Reasons for Doubt : Trading away Scott Hartnell for R.J. Umberger could have a negative impact on the offense (including the powerplay), because the trio of Giroux-Voracek-Hartnell was one of the best in the league last year. Their most versatile defenceman, Kimmo Timonen, is out for months if not more with blood clots (retiring isn’t out of the question). And most notably, goaltending is still an issue, as Steve Mason hasn’t shown he can be the guy he was in his rookie year on a consistent basis, a bad sign for a team that makes a lot of mistakes in its own end.

FPR Spotlight Player : Jakub Voracek finally broke out last year with his first 60 point season (62), well over his previous career high of 50. He was durable as well, playing all 82 games and recording a +12. His 10.26 FPR was better than Logan Couture and Pavel Datsyuk. It’ll be interesting to see if Voracek (and Giroux) regress with R.J. Umberger instead of Scott Hartnell.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

This team is all offense.

THE BUBBLE

19. Vancouver Canucks 

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : If this were last year, they’d definitely be trending down, but as a direct comparison to last season, things should be better this upcoming campaign. Ryan Miller is still a solid goalie and an upgrade on Eddie Lack, while Radim Vrbata is as good a winger as the Sedins have played with in a while, maybe ever. Losing Ryan Kesler hurts, but Nick Bonino is an underrated player who should be, at the very least, an average second line center. The Sedins took a step back, but I think they have a bounce back year. And the depth on D is not bad.

Reasons for Doubt : Obviously it starts with Henrik and Daniel. If they continue to decline, that $7 million dollar contract (for each) looks even uglier than it already does. That could really hamstring what the Canucks are able to spend elsewhere. And there’s always worry in Vancouver that goalies could either a) underperform, b) have the starter-backup situation mishandled, c) demand a trade, or d) all of the above (as we saw not once, but twice with Roberto Luongo and Cory Schneider).

FPR Spotlight Player : I mentioned Radim Vrbata being one of the best linemates the Sedins have ever had, but the same is probably true for Vrbata having the best linemates in his career as well. His FPR last year wasn’t that great at 3.77, but if you remember the rankings from Arizona’s preview, neither was anyone else’s. He should get loads of scoring chances this season, especially on the powerplay.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

You know it’ll take like two weeks for Ryan Miller to go from King to being thrown to the hyenas.

18. New York Islanders 

Trending : Way up.

Reasons for Hope : The areas where the Islanders were terrible last year, namely defence, goaltending, and any offense after the first line, have all improved for this season. Chad Johnson and Jaroslav Halak are definitely an upgrade on Evgeni Nabokov (second last in save percentage among goalies with 50 starts), Kevin Poulin and Anders Nilsson, while the additions of Johnny Boychuk and Nick Leddy, two solid NHL D-men, make it so that Travis Hamonic doesn’t need to play all of the minutes. And Mikael Grabovski and Nikolai Kulemin are reunited to add some much needed depth of front. They’re far from Cup contenders, but their roster looks a lot better today than one year ago. Finally, let’s mention that the Isles are one year away from leaving The Nassau Coliseum (Of Asbestos) for the sparkling, shiny new Barclays Center in Brooklyn.

Reasons for Doubt : John Tavares looks pretty good so far with 5 points in 2 games, but he is coming off a major knee injury, and he was so-so at best in the preseason. I heard Isles beat reporter Arthur Staple say it looked like both Tavares and Kyle Okposo looked out of sync and were “trying to do too much”. Sure, that was just the preseason, but the Isles can not afford to have their top line falter if they have any hope of making the playoffs. Plus, who knows what Nick Leddy and Johnny Boychuk will do outside the shelter of the sound defensive clubs that are the Blackhawks and Bruins, respectively? It feels almost too good to be true.

FPR Player Spotlight : There’s a recurring theme here with players recording career-highs, and the same was the case for Kyle Okposo last year. After a solid rookie season where he finished 4th in Calder voting, Okposo struggled the following years…until last year. 27 goals, 69 points, and the 10th best FPR in the league at 13.65, ahead of Patrice Bergeron and Phil Kessel. I think he’s officially made that next step.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

Islanders are like, “yo we’re in New York too!”

17. Colorado Avalanche

Trending : Slightly down.

Reasons for Hope : There’s a lot to love here, starting with the one-two punch of Matt Duchene and Nathan Mackinnon down the middle. Man, is that some speed and skill. Gabriel Landeskog is a budding star on the wing, and Tyson Barrie is one of the most underrated blueliners in the league. But let’s get back to Mackinnon for a second. I think we’re about to see a sophomore jump, not slump. I wouldn’t be surprised if he scored 30 goals and 80 points. This guy is so much fun to watch. Not to mention that the Avs added Jarome Iginla, who’s still a quality producer in this league.

Reasons for Doubt : The advanced metrics say the Avalanche were a lucky team last year, thriving on outstanding goaltending and timely scoring to win the division (something that isn’t expected to continue over time). The puck possession numbers say Colorado was probably not even a playoff team, all else considered equal. And those are the same stats that predicted the eventual Leafs demise. At some point, you’re due to regress, and unless the defensive play improves, that’s likely to be the case with the Avs this year.

FPR Spotlight Player : Did I mention I like Nathan Mackinnon? He pretty much shined in every facet in his rookie season, including FPR, where his 9.07 was in the top 50 of the league, ahead of Milan Lucic. Apparently he’s bulked up this offseason to become an even better physical specimen. With that speed and puck sense, he’s scratching the surface of superstardom.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

Those wheels though.

16. Toronto Maple Leafs 

Trending : Slightly down.

Reasons for Hope : The analytics movement inside the organization has already started to have a positive impact. The bottom-6 was one of biggest areas of concern last year, and it has been completely overturned. Gone are Colton Orr and Frazer McLaren, replaced by guys like Daniel Winnik, Leo Komarov, and Mike Santorelli. If everything else stays relatively close to the same except for better production from the bottom-6, the Leafs should be a playoff team. Jonathan Bernier and James Reimer still form a solid 1-2 tandem in net.

Reasons for Doubt : A lot went well last year, and it still wasn’t enough. The top line was fantastic, as was the goaltending overall. Both could regress. And just because the Leafs are investing in puck possession, it doesn’t mean coach Randy Carlyle is going to do anything about it strategy-wise. If Jake Gardiner, Morgan Rielly and Nazem Kadri don’t see the ice more often, things might not improve significantly. And with the Leafs, it always feels like the more things change, the more they stay the same. Defensive zone play is still an issue, and unless it’s resolved, this team is a pretender, not a contender.

FPR Player Spotlight : For all the talk of the Leafs not having a “true number one center”, Tyler Bozak had a very productive year. It helps to play between Phil Kessel and James Van Riemsdyk, but not enough credit is given to Bozak in that discussion. His FPR was 2nd on the team (just behind Kessel’s). He’s their best faceoff guy and plays in all situations.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

But keep stuffing the Leafs down everyone’s throat.

15. Washington Capitals

Trending : Slightly up.

Reasons for Hope : Death, taxes, and Alexander Ovehckin scoring goals. A lot of people like to harp on Ovechkin’s defensive play, but he remains the best goal-scorer in the game. He’s the only player to have 30 or more goals in every year since the lockout (that includes a 32-goal season in a 48 game season back in 2012-2013). It’s just taken for granted now; there was almost no excitement over his 50 goal season last year. You know how many other active players have scored 50 or more twice in their career? Two. Dany Heatley and Steven Stamkos. Aside from Ovechkin, the Caps shored up their blueline by overpaying for signing Matt Niskanen and Brooks Orpik.

Reasons for Doubt : Last year the Caps weren’t happy with Braden Holtby, so they acquired Jaroslav Halak in an attempt to upgrade their goaltending. This year, they’re going back to Holtby, and that’s still an area of concern. The defensive play is also an issue (Washington was bottom 10 in goals allowed, and none of those 10 teams made the playoffs), as is goal scoring after Ovie (Troy Brouwer and Joel Ward were 2 and 3).

FPR Player Spotlight : Speaking of Joel Ward, the former UPEI Panther (yeah CIS hockey!) had a career high in goals (25), assists (24), and, obviously, points (49). But more importantly, Ward was not a liability defensively; his team was a full goal per game better when he was on the ice (while the Capitals were over a goal and half per game worse when Ovie was on the ice). Because of that, he put up a team-high 6.48 FPR last year.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

I wonder if Barry Trotz can do anything for Ovechkin’s defense.

14. Detroit Red Wings

Trending : Even.

Reasons for Hope : Gooooose. Gustav Nyquist arrived last year in a big, big way. In a 23 game stretch from January 20th to April 2nd, Nyquist scored 23 goals in 28 games. 23 in 28! He finished with 47 points in 58 games, and it’s going to be exciting to see what he’ll do in his first full year with the Wings. Lot of good young players here, starting with the Tomas’ (Tatar and Jurco), as well as Riley Sheahan and D-man Danny DeKeyser. And it won’t be long for 1st rounder Anthony Mantha to make the show either.

Reasons for Doubt : The two aging stars, Pavel Datsyuk and Henrik Zetterberg, have struggled to stay healthy in recent years, and already Datsyuk is our for a while after suffering a separated shoulder.There’s a big drop-off in talent after Niklas Kronwall on D, and there’s worry that Jimmy Howard might be on the decline as well.

FPR Player Spotlight : This one is certainly off the board, but Riley Sheahan quietly had a productive year in 42 games with the Wings. His Relative Corsi was better than Justin Williams and Bryan Little, and Detroit was more than 1.5 goals per game better with Sheahan on the ice. If Pavel Datsyuk’s injury is worse than expected, don’t be surprised if he climbs up the depth chart and finds himself as the  #2 center at some point.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

Gooooooooose. This is the Detroit way. Win. Puck. Battles.

13. New York Rangers

Trending : Down.

Reasons for Hope : It obviously starts with the King in net, Henrik Lundqvist. Arguably the best goalie in the game, there’s a good chance that he could single-handedly lift the Rangers to a playoff spot. His numbers are staggering : a career .920 save percentage and 2.26 GAA…in 574 games. Neither of the two other active goalies that have those kind of numbers (Rask and Schneider) have even cracked 200 career games. It’s amazing durability. There’s some really good players on defense, led by newly appointed captain Ryan McDonagh, as well as Marc Staal, Dan Girardi and even Dan Boyle. Up front, I think we see a breakout year from Chris Kreider. He has all the tools, and we started to see glimpses of it in the playoffs (13 points in 15 games).

Reasons for Doubt : The Rangers are suddenly depleted at center. They lost Brad Richards to free agency, and now Derek Stepan is out indefinitely with a broken leg. As of right now, it looks like Kreider will play some center, along with Derrick Brassard, JT Miller, and Dominic Moore. That’s not strong down the middle. And there’s a pretty big drop-off already after the top two lines. Secondary scoring could be an issue.

FPR Spotlight Player : Latvian Mats Zuccarello had his coming out party in the playoffs, especially against the Kings – he only had 2 points in the Stanley Cup Final, but that line (with Pouliot and Brassard) was the best one for the Rangers in the series. But he had a solid season with 59 points, a 6.4 Relative Corsi and a +.62 plus minus differential. His 8.54 FPR led all returning Rangers.

Slightly Appropriate GIF :

The Rangers hopes for now rest on the shoulders of this guy.

PLAYOFF BOUND

12. Columbus Blue Jackets

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : The one-two punch down the middle is great. Finally with a contract, Ryan Johansen should continue his march towards becoming one of the league’s best centers. He had 33 goals and 63 points in his first full season with Columbus, and it’s not inconceivable to see him (eventually) reach 40 goals and 90 points. And Brandon Dubinsky is a great number two center. He adds a bit of offense, but more importantly, can frustrate opponent’s best players (exbhibit A : Sidney Crosby in last year’s playoffs). This team is feisty, and relies on great goaltending from BOBROVSKY!.

Reasons for Doubt : The Jackets aren’t so loaded with talent that a step back is out of the question, and it starts with health. Dubinsky is out for 6 weeks with a lower body injury, while Nathan Horton and Boone Jenner are out as well. Plus, who knows how long it takes Johansen to get back into game form after holding out for the entire preseason? That great one-two punch needs to be just that, great. Otherwise, there could be issues.

FPR Spotlight Player : Let’s go back to Brandon Dubinsky for a second. He’s a solid defensive center, as I mentioned, and chipped in 16 goals and 50 points as well. The Jackets are one of only 6 teams returning two such offensive centers (along with the Bruins, Avalanche, Islanders, Penguins, and Lightning). He was among the leaders in plus-minus for CBJ at +5, and he’s a great faceoff man and penalty killer to boot. Those last qualities don’t show up in FPR, but his rating was still second on the team at 6.63 behind only Johansen.

Appropriate GIF : When healthy, Dubinsky is one of the best shutdown forwards in the league. He’s the key to any amount of success in the playoffs for CBJ.

11. Dallas Stars 

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : With the acquisition of Jason Spezza and Ales Hemsky, the Stars top-6 is officially stacked. It’ll be interesting to see exactly how it looks, but for now it seems that they’ll go Tyler Seguin – Jamie Benn – Ales Hemsky and Jason Spezza – Valeri Nichuskin – Antoine Roussel. With Seguin, Spezza and Benn, the Stars are one of only three teams who carry 3 players with 65 points or more last season (Pittsburgh and Chicago are the others). Offense should not be a problem…

Reasons for Doubt : …but defense might be. Their D-corps still doesn’t inspire confidence, and it’s difficult to put too much trust on Kari Lehtonen, especially in the category of health (he’s already questionable for the season opener with a concussion). Last year, the Stars allowed 2.72 goals per game; among playoff teams, only the Flyers were worse defensively. And unless things change in the defensive zone, it’ll be difficult for Dallas to compete with the powerhouses in the West.

FPR Player Spotlight : I could focus on the fact that Jamie Benn (15.48) and Tyler Seguin (15.09) were 4th and 6th respectively in the league in FPR, but we already know that those guys offer great production. Someone you probably know less about? Ryan Garbutt, who was third in FPR among Dallas players last year at 5.74, a rating higher than Jeff Carter’s, Wayne Simmonds’ or Nazem Kadri’s. Garbutt was third in goals with 17, and his team was half a goal better per game when he was on the ice.

Appropriate GIF :

If you don’t pay attention to Dallas this year, that’s fine. Just know that you’ll be missing some entertaining stuff.

10. Minnesota Wild

Trending : Way up.

Reasons for Hope : This might be one of the teams I’m most interested in this season. They showed in the playoffs that they’re almost ready to be a perennial contender, and I’d like to see that begin this year. The Wild’s roster is reaally deep. When you have guys like Erik Haula, Charlie Coyle, Nino Nidorreiter and Matt Cooke in your bottom six, you’re doing very well. Same with the blueline; Ryan Suter, Jared Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin and Marco Scandella form a solid top 4. And despite what he did in the playoffs, Thomas Vanek is a great addition. Man I like this team. Don’t disappoint me, Minny!

Reasons for Doubt : Although I like the Vanek signing, there’s a chance he could destabilize the chemistry in that room. The lines were well established last year, and now Vanek comes in…does he squeeze himself into the top-6? And in place of whom? Plus, the goaltending situation is somewhat murky; Nicklas Backstrom hasn’t made more than 46 starts in any of the past three seasons, while Josh Harding is obviously in a tough spot health-wise dealing with MS (the fact that he still continues to fight to play is fantastic). And Darcy Kuemper has made 40 career starts (playoffs included); not exactly the kind of experience you would hope to bank on.

FPR Player Spotlight : Just to highlight what the Wild are getting in Thomas Vanek, the Austrian scored 27 goals and 66 points combined between the Sabres, Islanders and Habs last year. He would have ranked third in goals and first in points on the Wild with those numbers. His 12.30 FPR was 17th in the NHL last year, ahead of Toews and Giroux, and just below Kessel.

Appropriate GIF :

Remember, Koivu missed almost 20 games for the Wild last year. He’s healthy once again.

9. Montreal Canadiens

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : A great run in the postseason sets the expectations a little higher for this year. The Habs have one of the league’s best goalies in Carey Price (that .971 save percentage in the Olympics was amazing). PK Subban just inked a huge deal, and he’s worth the money. I think he grew immensely as an all-around player last year. If the young guns like Alex Galchenyuk and Brendan Gallagher keep getting better, so will this team. And I think Tom Gilbert was one of the most sneaky-good signings of the offseason.

Reasons for Doubt : The blueline is still a an area of weakness (relative to the rest of the team). Andrei Markov has lost a step with age, while the youngsters Alexei Emelin, Nathan Beaulieu and Jacob Tinordi have struggled to make an impact so far in their career. Plus, Josh Gorges was often the guy to reign in Subban, and he’s gone now. Up front, the Habs have a tendency to be very streaky, and they were one of only two playoff teams that were outscored 5 on 5 (Flyers were the other).

FPR Spotlight Player : A great move in the offseason saw the Habs getting P.A. Parenteau and a fifth round pick for Daniel Brière. (I don’t know what Colorado was thinking either). Parenteau has 70 goals in 264 games in his career, a 22 goal per year pace. Based on the numbers, he becomes the second-best goal scorer on the Habs, and last year his 9.53 FPR was top-50 in the league (ahead of Mackinnon and Lucic). He should help that offense.

Appropriate GIF :

Everyone in Canada is looking at you, Montreal. But with great power comes great responsibility.

8. San Jose Sharks 

Trending : Down.

Reasons for Hope : Look, the roster is still solid. Forget what happened in the playoffs and move on. Thornton, Couture, Pavelski, Marleau, Hertl and Wingels form a formidable top-6. And giving more ice time to Couture and Pavelski doesn’t hurt. Defensively, Marc-Édouard Vlasic is still one of the best shutdown guys, and Brent Burns is good wherever he plays. On paper, this is still a 50-win team.

Reasons for Doubt : But hockey isn’t played on paper. There’s already a lot of tension around there with how things went down in the postseason, and it continued in the offseason when the Sharks took away the captaincy from Thornton and basically tried to make things as uncomfortable for him as possible (so he’d waive his no-trade clause?). I fear things could unravel there. And the goalie situation is still not ideal. Neither Antti Niemi nor Alex Stalock really took the reigns in the playoffs. They do well in the regular season (because of how good the team is), but if San Jose starts playing poorly in front of them, they might not be able to steal games.

FPR Spolight Player : I mentioned Brent Burns earlier. He’s starting the season on the blueline, but I’m interested to see how long that lasts. He was playing with great players last year, but Burns had the second best FPR on the Sharks at 11.77, good for 22nd league-wide. He’s a physical force and is great on the powerplay. That being said, there’s so much depth up front that it makes sense to balance things out by putting him on the back end.

Appropriate GIF :

That time Tomas Hertl embarassed Marty Biron to the point where he retired from the NHL less than two weeks later.

7. Tampa Bay Lightning 

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : The Bolts finished 4th in the East despite missing Steven Stamkos for most of the year and having their captain bail on them at the trade deadline. They had a lot of production from their youngsters, especially calder nominees Tyler Johnson and Ondrej Palat. This year they add Jonathan Drouin to the fold, and he has the talent to step in and contribute immediately. They also have Vezina nominee Ben Bishop in net, and they added Jason Garrison and Anton Stralman to solidify their blueline. Lots to like here.

Reasons for Doubt : Before last year, Ben Bishop had never had a GAA better than 2.45; last year, it dipped to 2.23. The question is obviously whether last season was a breakout season or an outlier. If it’s the latter, it spells trouble for a Lightning team that has dealt with its share of goaltending issues in the past. Bishop played 63 games last year (before ultimately getting hurt); he had 67 games before last year in his career. So it’s not like he’s been doing this for a long time. Up front, there’s a feeling that the group of forwards played over their heads last year. We’ll find out if that’s true or not.

FPR Spotlight Player : The calder trophy runner up, Ondrej Palat, broke out with 23 goals and was one point shy of joining Nathan Mackinnon as the only rookies with 60 points. For what it’s worth, Palat also finished 11th in Selke voting, a testament to his well-rounded game. The numbers back it up as well, as the Lightning were almost a goal and half better per game when he was on the ice. (WIth Stamkos failing to reach 40 games played), Palat led Tampa with a 8.92 FPR.

Appropriate GIF :

What can’t he do?

LEGIT CONTENDERS

6. Pittsburgh Penguins 

Trending : Even.

Reasons for Hope : Having two top-10 players in the league in Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin means that the Penguins will almost always be, at the very least, pretty good. The biggest problem with this team in recent years has been secondary (or tertiary) scoring; that should improve this year with the acquisition of Steve Downie, Nick Spalling and Blake Comeau. On the blueline, look for Olli Maatta to become a go-to-guy, while in net, Marc-André Fleury is a great regular season goalie…

Reasons for Doubt : …but Fleury has certainly struggled in the playoffs lately. Since winning the Cup in 2009, Fleury is 21-22 with a .891 save percentage and a 2.94 goals against average (as opposed to his career .910 sv% and 2.62 GAA). I’ve backed the Penguins for a while now, but until they prove otherwise, they have to be labeled as an underachieving playoff team right now, much like the Sharks (the only difference being that the Pens actually won the cup 5 years ago). Pittsburgh has dealt with its share of health issues as well; Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Pascal Dupuis, Kris Letang, and Paul Martin all missed time last year, and that’s basically the core of the team.

FPR Spotlight Player : We know Crosby makes Chris Kunitz a much more productive player, but that doesn’t mean Kunitz is worthless without Crosby. I still maintain that Kunitz earned his spot on Team Canada. He’s scored at least 20 goals in 8 of the past 9 years, and last year he reached a career high in goals (35) and points (68). He has grit to his game and is a perfect fit with Sid. Last year, his 12.03 FPR was 20th in the league.

Appropriate GIF :

Playoff Penguins are so easy to push around.

5. Anaheim Ducks 

Trending : Slightly down.

Reasons for Hope : The duo of Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry is as good as any in hockey. They both have size and grit along with elite offensive ability. Getzlaf is second in points in the past two seasons combined, while Perry is second in goals in that same span. The addition of a true number two center in Ryan Kesler should help solidify the top-6. On the back end, Cam Fowler is emerging as one of the best young defencemen in hockey, while the duo of Frederik Andersen and John GIbson should be more than competent in net.

Reasons for Doubt : The Ducks lost a lot of key pieces that complimented the top line. Gone from Anaheim are Nick Bonino (49 points), Mathieu Perreault (43 points), Daniel Winnik (30 points), Saku Koivu (29 points), and Teemu Selanne (27 points). It might not be a star-studded list, but those were 5 of the Ducks 10 top scoring forwards last year. Secondary scoring could definitely be a problem.

FPR Spotlight Player : We know about Getzlaf and Perry, who unsurprisingly were 1-2 in FPR for Anaheim last year, but you’ll probably be shocked to know that Pat Maroon was third at 7.79 (which is just below Ryan Johansen). Maroon’s FPR was helped in large part by his 15.9 Relative Corsi rating (Sidney Crosby’s was 16.0). As of right now, Pat Maroon is practicing alongside Perry and Getzlaf on the top line, so don’t be surprised to see his production continue to grow.

Appropriate GIF :

Bruce Boudreau is like a cartoon character, but also a pretty good coach.

4. St. Louis Blues

Trending : Up.

Reasons for Hope : The Blues are deep, man. With the addition of Paul Stastny, the top-6 looks like this : David Backes, TJ Oshie, Alexander Steen, Paul Stastny, Jaden Schwartz, Vladimir Tarasenko. Wow. And they still have guys like Patrick Berglund, Steve Ott and Maxime Lapierre on the bottom-6. On defence, I think you can make the argument that the trio of Alex Pietrangelo, Jay Bouwmeester and Kevin Shattenkirk is the best trio of D-men in hockey. The Blues are great on special teams as well, ranking top-6 in both PP and PK (the Pens were the only club to accomplish that).

Reasons for Doubt : Goaltending is obviously the biggest question mark. The Blues are going to ride the hot hand between Brian Elliott and Jake Allen. And it’s not that we know these guys are bad, it’s that we don’t know for sure that they’ll be good. Elliott has had a few decent moments in his career (like that .940 save percentage in 2011-2012), but his career save percentage of .911 is just ok. Meanwhile, Allen has only played in 15 career games, and with a save percentage of .905 in those games, he hasn’t shown anything that definitively says he’ll be a star. There’s such a fine line between the great teams in the West and the elite, and right now the Blues are the former. In two of the past 3 years, they lost to the eventual Stanley Cup champions.

FPR Spotlight Player : In his first 82-game season with St. Louis, Vladimir Tarasenko showed a lot of promise. He tallied 21 goals, was 13th in the league with a 17.7 Relative Corsi, and helped his team be more than a goal per game better when he was on the ice. All that translated into the 18th best FPR in the league at 12.25. I think he has a 30-goal season in him this year.

Appropriate GIF :

Sure this might be a few years old, but it might be the best hockey gif ever.

3. Boston Bruins 

Trending : Slightly down.

Reasons for Hope : It begins with the Holy Trinity of Defense, namely Patrice Bergeron, Zdeno Chara and Tuukka Rask. Having an elite defensive center, blueliner and goalie is a great foundation to success (the Kings have shown that as well). Boston was the best 5-on-5 team last year, outscoring opponents 1.53 to 1. They allowed the second fewest goals and scored the third most, and have been top-4 in East standings for 4 straight years. Oh, and the roster is still really good.

Reasons for Doubt : Cap issues have forced the Bruins to let Jarome Iginla walk and trade away Johnny Boychuk; they’ll miss both those guys. Iginla had a bounce-back year with 30 goals and formed one of the league’s best trios with David Krejci and Milan Lucic, while Boychuk logged 21 solid minutes a night (a career-high), his 4th straight year of 20+ minutes per game. The outlook for next year cap-wise isn’t that much better; Torey Krug, Dougie Hamilton, Ryan Spooner and Reilly Smith are all RFAs at the end of the season, while Carl Soderberg and Matt Bartkowski are UFAs. It’s so tough to keep elite teams together in the cap era.

FPR Spotlight Player : Among that group of upcoming free agents is Reilly Smith, who had 20 goals, 51 points and was a +28 in his first full year in the league (and he’s started this year on the right foot with a goal in his first game). He also had a 13.3 Relative Corsi, and finished the year with a 8.04 FPR, good for 5th on that stacked Bruins roster.

Appropriate GIF :

No team says “intimidation” like the Boston Bruins.

2. Los Angeles Kings

Trending : Even (at awesome).

Reasons for Hope : Hmmm. This is tough. Let me think. How about bringing back practically the exact same roster that won the Stanley Cup last year? Is that good enough? That includes young guns like Tanner Pearson, Tyler Toffoli and Jake Muzzin getting even better with another year under their belts. I could go on and on, but I don’t think I need to justify the strength of a defending Cup champion. The talent is still there.

Reasons for Doubt : I guess there’s fear of a Stanley Cup hangover, although after their first ring in 2012, the Kings still made the West Final next year. (That being said, things didn’t start glowingly, with a 4-0 shutout loss to the Sharks in the home opener). Plus, it’s sooo hard to repeat in the modern NHL. Aside from that, there’s belief that Jonathan Quick might be a tad overrated. Over the last two seasons (including playoffs), Quick has a .914 save percentage, which is just “good” in today’s NHL, not elite like he’s portrayed to be. (Of 29 goalies that played at least 40 games last year, 18 of them had a .915 save percentage or better).

FPR Spotlight Player : I really like Tyler Toffoli’s game. Last year he scored 12 goals in 62 games (a 16-goal pace) despite playing less than 13 minutes a game. (His point production was basically identical to Pat Maroon’s). Toffoli had a solid 9.9 Relative Corsi, and his team was a goal and a half better per game when he was on the ice. What we saw from Toffoli during the Kings Cup run should be the foundation of what we see this year.

Appropriate GIF :

It’s all about teamwork.

1. Chicago Blackhawks

Trending : Slightly up.

Reasons for Hope : A perennial contender, and it’s really a coin flip between the Hawks and the Kings for number one right now. Like LA, Chicago brings back almost the exact same team as last year, plus Brad Richards, minus Nick Leddy. Richards may not be the same guy he was when he won the Conn Smythe in 2004, but he’s still an upgrade down the middle (as the current #3 center). As for Leddy, the Hawks didn’t play him much in close situations last year in the playoffs because they couldn’t trust him. He’s not that great defensively. It’s not like the blueline is suddenly depleted or anything. They’ll be fine.

Reasons for Doubt : If we’re only speaking of this year, the reasons for doubt are probably few and far between, although goaltending can sometimes be an issue. Corey Crawford has been mostly good, but once in a while he’s still prone to flashes of inconsistency. Also, there’s questions as to where the secondary scoring will come from. Aside from Andrew Shaw, I’m not sure you can expect too much from Marcus Kruger or Kris Versteeg or Daniel Carcillo. But next year is where the questions really come in. Much like the Bruins, the Blackhawks are going to need to make some moves to accommodate the cap situation, mainly because of the $10.5 million dollar cap hit that both Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane will own. Brandon Saad is an RFA, while Johnny Oduya and Michael Rozsival are both UFAs. Don’t be surprised if Patrick Sharp is moved at some point this season or in the offseason.

FPR Spotlight Player : He’s often overlooked when we talk about the stars on the Blackhawks, but Marian Hossa is still a great player at the age of 35. Hossa has never won the Selke (last year he finished a career-high 5th in voting), but his defensive play is among the league’s best for wingers (there’s definitely a center bias for that award – of the past 23 winners, only Jere Lehtinen won it as a winger). Hossa hit the 30-goal mark last year for the first time since 2009, had a 9.9 Relative Corsi and a +0.77 plus minus differential. His 10.69 FPR was 3rd on the Hawks and 30th in the league.

Appropriate GIF :

The dirtiest mitts in the game, and he’s a great playoff performer too. The Hawks have all the pieces once again.

PREDICTIONS 

There you have it. If you’ve stayed with me this long, you may be interested in my predictions (or not at all, but either way you’ll get them). I have the Lightning making it out of the East to face the Blues in the Stanley Cup Final, with the Blues taking home their first ever Cup.

Enjoy the season!

2014 NHL Offseason Awards

You know, it’s been over a month since anyone in the big-4 sports scene has won a trophy or an award of any kind (congrats to Germany, but I’m still not counting you for this purpose). For the last hardware, we have to go back to June 24th at the NHL Awards, where the big winner was Sidney Crosby, he of the Hart Memorial Trophy, the Art Ross Trophy, the Lester B. Pearson Award and somehow the FIFA Golden Ball.

Anyway, it’s been a while, and it’ll still be a while until the World Series trophy is dolled out. That’s over 4 months without anyone winning anything. WHAT IS THIS MADNESS? ISN’T SPORTS ABOUT WINNING THINGS?

Hey there, calm down (he said, rhetorically). I’m here to satisfy your craving for things being won. Welcome to the 2014 NHL Offseason Awards, where I arbitrarily hand out useless, made up and often silly awards to people who couldn’t care less about the fact that they have been recognized in such a manner.

The “Take Your Agent To Dinner” Award (given to the player who most benefited from his agent’s diligent work in making him overpaid) : Dave Bolland 

So David Clarkson signed a godawful contract last summer that’ll pay him $5.25 million dollars per year for another 6 years. Meanwhile, the Panthers are paying Dave Bolland $5.5 million per year for the next 5 years. Dave Bolland is a career third-liner who has never scored more than 19 goals or 28 points in a season; Clarkson scored 30 in a (contract) year. And again, his contract was terrible. Bolland’s is even worse.

Never has one goal been worth so much money.

The “Drunk Guy At A Bar” Award (given to the team who seems to have spent money without thinking things through) : Calgary Flames

Jonas Hiller’s contract wasn’t good (2 years, $4.5 million per), especially when you consider that Ondrej Pavelec (.904) is the only goaltender with a worse save percentage in the past 3 seasons (for goalies with at least 140 GP) than Hiller’s .911 – and that number by itself screams disaster in more ways than one. The Flames also overpaid Mason Raymond, at $9.5 million total over 3 years. Raymond isn’t a bad player, but after numerous injury woes, he still couldn’t crack the 20-goal mark last year despite playing all 82 games.

But the worse move of all was signing Deryk Engelland, yes, Deryk Engelland, to a 3 year, $2.9 million per contract. That’s right, $2.9 million PER YEAR. He’s a fringe NHLer at best, a bordeline 7th defenceman, and somehow he’ll be making more money next year then actual NHL-caliber blueliners like Jared Spurgeon, Nick Leddy and Karl Alzner.

Brian Burke might not have beer goggles, but he certainly has truculence goggles.

The “Big Corsi” Award (given to the team who has demonstrated an extraordinary effort in pursuing advanced metrics darlings) Edmonton Oilers

The contracts aren’t outstanding, but in getting Mark Fayne and Derrick Pouliot (at $3.5 mil and $4 mil per respectively), the Oilers are clearly embracing the advanced possession stats. Both players were among their team leaders in Corsi-for % (the relative index of shot attempts for versus shot attempts against while on the ice). Fayne has been a solid defender for a few years now in New Jersey, while Pouliot was a key member of the Rangers’ Cup Final run, playing on what turned out to be New York’s best line against the Kings (alongside Derrick Brassard and Mats Zuccarello).

Quick, someone translate “puck possession” in Russian for Nail Yakupov before he’s traded.

The “Juan Francisco” Award (given to the team who struck out too many times this summer) : Detroit Red Wings

Dan Boyle (Rangers). Matt Niskanen (Capitals). Christian Erhoff (Penguins). Anton Stralman (Lightning). Stéphane Robidas (Maple Leafs). Tom Gilbert (Canadiens).

That’s the (non-exhaustive) list of defenceman that the Red Wings were chasing on July 1st. Besides the names of the players are the teams they chose over Detroit. And what do all those teams have in common? They’re all in the East, just like the Wings are.

In case you’re wondering, Juan Francisco is the active leader in strike outs per at bat for players with at least 1,000 plate appearances (at the time of this writing), at a staggering pace of 34.6%.

Wings fans can take solace, though, in the fact that, in about 8% of his at bats this season, Francisco has hit a home run.

Which must be how they describe the resigning of Dan Cleary, right?

The “If It Ain’t Broke” Award (given to the team.s that sensibly kept a winning formula pretty much intact) :  Chicago Blackhawks and Los Angeles Kings

This one’s a tie, and it goes to the last two Stanley Cup champions (who are definitely among the favourites going into this year). The Hawks lost double-backup Jason Labarbera to the Ducks (tear) and took a one year, $2 million dollar flyer on Brad Richards. Meanwhile, the Kings were able to resign Marian Gaborik, Matt Green and Jeff Schultz, only losing Willie Mitchell from their Cup winning core. Not exactly a fire sale.

I doubt I’ll be giving these two the award next year, however. In Chicago, the extensions to both Kane and Toews kick in after this season (a jump from $6.3 mil each per year to $10.5 mil), while Brandon Saad and Nick Leddy will both be looking for extensions as RFAs.

And while LA doesn’t see any big extensions kicking in, they have a lot of key guys coming off the books after this season. It starts with 6 RFAs, including the great trio of Tyler Toffoli, Tanner Pearson and Jake Muzzin. Add to that the 5 UFAs that include the likes of 2014 Conn Smythe winner Justin Williams, 2014 Cup-clincher Alec Martinez, and Erin Andrews boy-toy Jarrett Stoll, and there’s a good chance the Kings have a much different look in 2015-2016.

But for at least one more year, the Kings and Hawks appear to be the class of the West. Let’s enjoy it while it lasts.

The “College Freshman” Award (given to the team who did enough to achieve the minimum requirements and nothing more) : Buffalo Sabres

in this case, I’m talking about the minimum requirements of the salary cap. Despite spending nearly $48 million dollars total so far this offseason, the Sabres still have over $10 million dollars of cap space (according to capgeek), and that’s for a 25 man roster. When they get down to 21, they could be anywhere from 13 to 15 million short of the $69 million dollar cap; they’ll definitely be among the league’s lowest spenders (and closer to the $51 million dollar floor than most).

This team is still in the Connor McDavid sweepstakes. If you think Matt Moulson, Andrej Meszaros, Brian Gionta and Josh Gorges have suddenly transformed Sabres from a 21 win team to a playoff team, you should apply for their marketing department, I’m sure they’d be thrilled to have you.

The “Sun Rises In The East” Award (given to the player who endured the most predictable outcome) : Thomas Vanek

If Vanek signing with the Wild took you by surprise, you might be among the few remaining. The writing’s been on the wall for a while now, with numerous outlets speculating he’d find his way to Minny, like this one, this one, or this one. And many more.

If you haven’t heard by now, Vanek played college hockey at the University of Minnesota. His wife is from Minnesota. And his good buddy ol’ pal Jason Pomminville plays in Minnesota. To say it was likely for him to wind up there was an understatement. Luckily (or unluckily?) for the Wild, Vanek struggled in the postseason with the Habs and ended up only costing them $19.5 million over three years, instead of a potential $40 million dollar contract.

The “Transformers” Award (given to the team who has changed the identity of its franchise this summer) : Toronto Maple Leafs

First the Leafs fired their assistant coaches. Then, they hired Brendan Shanahan to be the in charge of all hockey operations (except for the things Dave Nonis does?). Then they fired more assistants, this time asst. GMs, who they replaced with advanced metrics/midichlorian-infused wonderkid Kyle Dubas. Meanwhile, on the roster side of things, they let guys like Dave Bolland and Mason Raymond walk because they were going to be overpaid, and added 6 new faces (well 5 if you don’t count the return of Leo Komarov) without paying more than 3 million for any of them.

So to reiterate, the Leafs brought in people that are embracing the advanced metrics movement, all the while resisting to overpay a washed up veteran? Wow. Times, they are a-changin’.

Although…last I checked, Michael Bay is still the director of Transformers, and Dave Nonis is still GM of the Leafs. (If you’re wondering, Bay’s first installment in the Transformers series came out in 2007, while Nonis joined the Leafs in 2008. Not sure what that means, but I figured you wanted to know).

The more things change…

The “LeBron James” Award (given to the superstar player who is coming home to help end a terrifyingly long championship drought) : Steven Stamkos.

Just kidding.

That one’s for the 2016 edition.

The 1 to 16 Format : Redesigning the Playoffs for the NHL and the NBA

If you’ve been following pro sports pretty closely this year, you probably noticed one flagrant similarity between the NHL and the NBA; in both cases, the Western conference was significantly stronger than the Eastern conference. Both the LA Kings and San Antonio Spurs cruised to a title in 5 games against Eastern conference opponents in their respective championship series.

In both leagues, the dominance came from opening night through the final buzzer. In the NHL, the Western conference was almost 6 points or 3 full wins better per team than the East was during the regular season. In the NBA, the West was nearly 8 wins better per team that the East. At 48-34, the Phoenix Suns finished 9th in the East and failed to make the playoffs; they would have been tied for 3rd in the East. Or, to flip the scenario, with the same record, the Toronto Raptors (48-34) would not have made the playoffs in the West.

And this #WestIsBest trend isn’t new – it’s been like this for quite some time now in both leagues. Since Michael Jordan left the Bulls for good in 1999, the NBA’s West teams have been, on average, more than 4 wins per season better than the East teams in the regular season (43.03 wins per season for the West, 38.86 for the East). That’s substantial.

How substantial? Using ESPN’s Estimated Wins Added metric (that measures a player’s value to his team), a difference of 4 wins per year would be like having 2013-2014 Paul George instead of 2013-2014 Rudy Gay at small forward for 15 consecutive years. Imagine that Raptors fans. Either way you look at it, it’s dominance. The East only had one season in the past 15 years with a better combined record than the West, and that was in 2009 (by a fairly small margin, 41.4 average wins to 40.6). The West has won 10 of the 15 championships.

It’s a similar picture in the NHL, where the dominance hasn’t been as imposing as the NBA, but even more consistent in the regular season. In the same 15-year span (since the loser point became a thing in 2000), the West has been better than the East in every single season. West teams have racked up, on average, about 2.5 points more per season than the East. But interestingly enough, the Stanley Cups in that stretch only slightly favour the West, 8-7.

Which brings me to my biggest issue, which is that we need to start rewarding regular season success properly : by having the 16 best teams in the playoffs, regardless of the conference, with the matchups as 1 vs. 16, 2 vs. 15, and so on.

So many reasons to go to this format:

  1. It places more importance on the regular season in its entirety. Because home ice and overall seeding are at a premium, teams can’t coast through the year in an easier conference (Pittsburgh Penguins and Miami Heat, we’re looking at you). The Pens were able to rest guys at the end of the season because they had the 2nd seeded pretty much locked in for the final month. But with 1 through 16 seeding, they would’ve had the 5th seed, which means they were only guaranteed home ice for the first round. Furthermore, all inter-conference games become more meaningful because of the playoff race. That outdoor game at Wrigley Field this year between Chicago and Pittsburgh? Could’ve been a mammoth game in the playoff race in this scenario (the Pens finished just 2 points ahead of the Hawks in league standings). Instead, it was kind of a letdown.
  2. Better odds at great late-playoff matchups. You always get the chance of having the two best teams facing off in the championship series (Stanley Cup Final or NBA Finals) regardless of their conference. Looking back at this year’s Stanley Cup Playoffs, it’s clear now that the “real” championship series was Chicago-LA. Because the West was that much stronger, the winner of the conference finals was pretty much a lock to win it all. And sure, we may not have had Chicago against Los Angeles in the Cup Finals under this structure, but we probably would have had 2 West teams, which would’ve have been the better hockey matchup.
  3. More parity (or at least a fairer draft structure). Here’s where things get interesting, and it’s something we almost never consider. (I’m not taking any credit for this; I heard it from San Antonio Spurs General Manager RC Buford, a man who knows a thing or two about winning in a tough conference, on Grantland’s Lowe Post Podcast). Because the West has been stronger for a while now (in both the NHL and NBA), the teams that are missing the playoffs in the West are usually stronger than those missing in the East. Let’s use the Phoenix Suns as the example again. With 48 wins, the Suns really deserved to make the playoffs, but they didn’t because of their strong conference. In finishing out the playoffs, the Suns now get to draft 14th overall. The Raptors on the other hand, who had the same number of wins as Phoenix (but who were 3rd thanks to a poor conference and division), get the 20th pick. In other words, because the West is so strong, the teams that are missing the playoffs are actually getting to pick higher (and getting better) than they should be. Conversely, the East teams are not only weaker to begin with, they are getting even weaker by drafting from a less favourable position. It’s a vicious cycle that has no end in sight. With 1 through 16 seeding, that issue won’t exist anymore.
  4. The opportunity for new rivalries. Heated rivalries are spawned through playoff battles. Red Wings-Avalanche, Bulls-Knicks, Spurs-Lakers, Habs-Bruins, Red Sox-Yankees, and so on. The Leafs and Habs are one of the oldest, but nowadays the rivalry isn’t as strong because they haven’t met in the playoffs since 1979. As it stands right now, there’s a very slim chance that, let’s say, Boston-Chicago would develop a strong (modern) rivalry. But had they met 4 or 5 times in a row in the playoffs, maybe they would have. Wouldn’t you like to see it anyway? Same with guys being traded away; we probably won’t get to see much of anything develop with Jason Spezza’s new team (whenever that comes) and the Senators, but if they could meet in the playoffs, it’d be so much fun. Just look at what this year’s matchups would have been in the first round of the NHL playoffs.
  • 1. Boston Bruins vs. 16. Dallas Stars
  • 2. Anaheim Ducks vs. 15. Detroit Red Wings
  • 3. Colorado Avalanche vs. 14. Columbus Blue Jackets
  • 4. St. Louis Blues vs. 13. Philadelphia Flyers
  • 5. San Jose Sharks vs. 12. New York Rangers
  • 6. Pittsburgh Penguins vs. 11. Minnesota Wild
  • 7. Chicago Blackhawks vs. 10. Los Angeles Kings
  • 8. Tampa Bay Lightning vs. 9. Montreal Canadiens

Some pretty cool stuff there, including the Tyler Seguin dynamic between the Bruins and Stars, the Tomas Hertl – Joe Thornton – 4 goals thing between the Sharks and Rangers, and of course the Hawks and Kings series (that would’ve come too soon in this case). And I want to think that St. Louis-Philadelphia could be a great matchup, with lots of bad blood, but we may never get to see it under the current format.

In the NBA, it looks like this

  • 1. San Antonio Spurs vs. 16. Charlotte Bobcats
  • 2. Oklahoma City Thunder vs. 15. Brooklyn Nets
  • 3. Los Angeles Clippers vs. 14. Washington Wizards
  • 4. Indiana Pacers vs. 13. Phoenix Suns
  • 5. Miami Heat vs. 12. Chicago Bulls
  • 6. Houston Rockets vs. 11. Toronto Raptors
  • 7. Portland Trail Blazers vs. 10. Dallas Mavericks
  • 8. Golden State Warriors vs. 9. Memphis Grizzlies

There may not be as many juicy matchups in the first round, but how about LeBron James and the Miami Heat needing to go through (potentially) the Bulls, Pacers, Thunder and Spurs to have a chance at a 3rd straight title (instead of the Bobcats and Nets in the first two rounds)? All the great matchups. What you lose in the first round, you gain in the next three.

It’s not perfect. Nothing is. This format is used in the QMJHL, and generally speaking, the first two rounds are a joke. Lots of sweeps. And although I can imagine the first rounds being less anticlimactic under this format as opposed to what they are now, I don’t think we’d see that level of unbalanced play at the pro level. The difference between best and worst playoff teams in the pros, especially the NHL (cough LA Kings 2012 coiugh) isn’t as significant as it is in junior. You’d still have competitive series.

And some people will point out that it would be unfair if we went to that current format with the current scheduling because you’d play some teams more than others, but I think it’s the opposite. The Phoenix Suns played the Western conference more than the teams in the East did, and they still wound up with as good of a record (or better) than all but 2 teams in the East. If anything, the unbalanced schedule makes it even more obvious that we need to go to this format. I’m way more impressed by the Suns 48-34 record than the Raptors or Bulls 48-34 record.

Again, it’s all about rewarding success and putting a better premium on the regular season. And as it stands right now, we’re not doing it properly.

NHL Playoff Preview

Welcome to Year 1 of the new NHL playoff format, where divisional rivalries are highlighted, great playoff matchups happen one round too early, and division banners can go to teams in the wrong division.

Seriously, if the Dallas Stars, who play in the Central Division, upset the Anaheim Ducks and then defeat the winner of the Sharks-Kings series, they win the Pacific Division banner. That’s a thing. Anyway, let’s get to it.

EASTERN CONFERENCE

1. Pittsburgh vs. 4. Columbus

Why you should watch : There’s this guy named Sidney Crosby, you may have heard of him. He’s the best player in the world and the runaway MVP. Seriously though, watching Crosby play is always fun because he’s on a completely different level.

This year, Crosby finished with 104 points, 17 more than Ryan Getzlaf. That’s 20% more than the next closest. The last guy to have that significant gap between himself and the next closest point-getter was…Wayne Gretzky, in 1991, when he had 163 and Jaromir Jagr had 131.

And beyond Pittsburgh’s other superstar Evgeni Malkin (I doubt that’s how he likes being referred to), it’ll be interesting to see how Ryan Johansen stacks up against the best (and potentially third or fourth-best) center in the NHL. Plus, you wouldn’t want to miss Columbus’ first ever playoff win (if indeed it happens).

How it can be an upset : Two (or three?) words : Marc-André Fleury. The former Stanley Cup champion has been nothing short of awful in recent playoff years. In 31 postseason games since winning the Cup in ’09, Fleury has an .880 save % and 3.18 goals against average. Not necessarily numbers you can feel confident about. And not to mention that the guy on the other end was 5th (.923) in save percentage among goalies with at least 50 starts. Bobrovsky could very well out-duel Fleury (or Zatkoff, or even Vokoun, who’s apparently close to returning).

Who wins : Pittsburgh in 6. I think Bobrovsky might steal a game or two, but ultimately Crosby, Malkin and that league-best powerplay are going to be too much to handle.

2. New York vs. 3. Philadelphia

Why you should watch : On one end, you have the fire-wagon Flyers who have bounced back from a 1-8 start to storm back into the playoff picture, thanks to another strong campaign from captain and former best player in the world Claude Giroux (I say former only because Peter Laviolette’s opinion became history when he did).  On the other side is a stingy New York club that allowed the 4th fewest goals in the league with King Henrik Lundqvist (and, at times, Cam effin’ Talbot) in net.

It’s your classic offense vs. defense battle. And if you’ve seen some Flyers games this year, you know that just about anything can happen.

How it can be an upset : If the Rangers dry up as they sometimes have a tendency to do. In their last 4 playoff exits, the Rangers have averaged less than 1.5 goals per game in their losing series’. Two of those series losses, both in the first round, came against the Washington Capitals, a similar offensive-minded team like the Flyers. Philadelphia had seven 20-goal scorers this year, so if offense becomes an issue for New York, it could spell a problem.

Who wins : Philadelphia in 6. Sure Steve Mason might not be ready for game one, so the Flyers would have to go with Ray Emery, but we all remember Philly making the Stanley Cup finals in 2011 with Michael Leighton in net. This team is about offense, and they’ll overpower New York in the end.

1. Boston vs. 4. Detroit

Why you should watch : The battle between Pavel Datsyuk and/or Gustav Nyquist versus Zdeno Chara is intriguing, as is the coaching battle between Mike Babcock and Claude Julien, two of the best in the game. And if you thought Boston’s dominance in the regular season made them a lock to get to the second round, you might be underestimating those pesky Wings. No team has gone through more adversity with injuries this year, and they’re still competing with the best of them.

How it can be an upset : As I mentioned above, Gustav Nyquist has led Detroit to a fantastic end-of-season run. The Wings went 19-11-5 in their last 25 games, during which Nyquist had 23 goals 14 assists, good for 1.48 points per game (and that’s with just 2 points in his last 6 games). He can be a difference maker. If Jimmy Howard can find his 2012-2013 form, the Wings could be dangerous, just like they were last year when they upset Anaheim in round 1 (and almost upset Chicago in round 2).

Who wins : Boston in 5. With a Vezina trophy candidate in Tuuka Rask, three solid lines up front and the league’s most intimidating defenceman, the Bruins should roll here. Those kids have done some great things in Detroit, but over a long series, I think the Wings lack of depth will be exposed.

2. Tampa Bay vs. Montreal

Why you should watch : The fallout of Douglas Murray’s elbow on Mike Kostka could lead to a very gritty (if not dirty) series. And we’ve seen it from the Habs before, in fact we did last year, when Lars Eller hit Eryk Gryba and all hell broke loose. Countdown to Michel Therrien calling out Jon Cooper for his “lack of respeck” in 5, 4, 3…

Oh, and did I mention that it’s the first time we’ll get to see Steven Stamkos in the playoffs since 2011, when he had 13 points in 18 games in his only postseason, helping Tampa make it to the conference finals.

How it can be an upset : You have one of the league’s best goalies in Carey Price on one end, and nothing but questions on the other. Ben Bishop is out for Game 1, and you don’t know when he’s coming back. And despite the fact that Andres Lindback won the NHL’s first star of the past week, you don’t know what you’re getting from the 25 year old netminder in his first postseason action. Add in the fact that the Lightning have a bunch of rookies on their team, and you could make the argument that Montreal is actually the favorite given all the question marks on Tampa’s side.

Who wins : Montreal in 5. Carey Price showed in Sochi that he’s certainly not scared by the big moment. Max Pacioretty continues to be awesome for the Habs with a career-high 39 goals. Thomas Vanek was a great addition at the trade deadline, and don’t forget Danny Briere, who’s 1.01 points per game is 5th highest among players in this year’s postseason.

WESTERN CONFERENCE

1. Anaheim vs. 4. Dallas

Why you should watch : You have potentially the league’s two best duos facing off in Anaheim’s Corey Perry and Ryan Getzlaf and Dallas’ Jamie Benn and Tyler Seguin. Seriously. The Ducks and Stars were the only two teams that had two players in the top-10 in scoring, and they’re facing each other. Perry and Getzlaf combined for 169 points this year, Benn and Seguin 163.

A quick search on NHL.com tells that we haven’t had 4 top-10 scorers in the same playoff matchup in at least 16 years (the NHL website doesn’t date back farther than 1997-1998). Yeah, I know! That’s almost as awesome as getting a Nintendo 64 for Christmas.

How it can be an upset : Anaheim only has 1 playoff series win since their Cup in 2007, and they’ve been upset in the first round in 3 of their 4 playoff appearances since then. After the top line, the Ducks don’t have a lot of big name players (aside from Teemu Selanne, who is turning 156 this year I think). Sure, the Stars have a lack of depth as well after Seguin and Benn, but when you have two teams that rely on primary scoring as much as these two, anything can really happen. Plus, the Ducks are apparently either starting rookie Frederik Andersen or even-more-rookie John Gibson in net. That could be dangerous.

Who wins : Anaheim in 5. As much as I like that Dallas Green, and I mean the jerseys, not the singer (although he’s pretty good too), I can’t see the Stars pulling off the upset. I’d say the Ducks defense corps wins out over the Stars, a group that includes Cam Fowler, François Beauchemin, Hampus Lindholm and the trade-deadline acquisition of Stephane Robidas.

2. San Jose vs. 3. Los Angeles

Why you should watch : This is one of two series that is so awesome you wish you could save it for at least the next round, if not the Conference Finals. Size, speed, skill, defense, goaltending, depth…both these teams have plenty of all of that. Last year we got this matchup in the Conference semis, and it was great. I’m not expecting anything less. There’s a solid chance that this matchup could provide the Stanley Cup finalist from the West. I’m hoping I don’t need to sell you on this any more.

How it can be an upset : Trick question, because this is as close to an even matchup as you could possibly draw up. There isn’t a favorite, so there can’t be an underdog. The forward groups are basically even, the Sharks may have the advantage on defense, but the Kings have the advantage in goal. The home team has won 21 of the past 23 games between these two.

Who wins : I’ll go with the Sharks, and really only because of home ice. The Kings addition of Gaborik to an already strong forward group that includes Carter, Kopitar, Richards and Williams gives LA an added speed threat that they didn’t possess before. But on the other side, you have Thornton, Marleau, Pavelski, Couture, Burns, and soon, Hertl. Defensively, Vlasic and Doughty play the roles of shutdown guys on their respective teams. And Niemi has proven he can go shot-for-shot with anyone, even Quick, when he’s on his game. Home ice means everything in this series.

1. Colorado vs. Minnesota

Why you should watch : First, Colorado is such a fun team to watch. The fancy stats don’t like them too much, but fans do, because they play a very high-tempo, offensive minded game. Which is why Nathan MacKinnon has been able to fit right in as a reliable offensive threat.

Plus, and I’m sorry it took me this long to mention it, but you really never know what Patrick Roy is going to do, especially in his first postseason as a head coach. He started the year by throwing at pane of glass at Bruce Boudreau, and you can only expect him to step up his game on and off the ice during the playoffs. Playoff Patrick gave us the Best Broken English Chirp Ever. Imagine what he’ll do as a coach.

How it can be an upset : The Avs injury list includes Matt Duchene, John Mitchell, Tyson Barrie, Cody McLeod, Cory Sarich and Jan Hejda, and there are a lot of question marks about which ones will be available for Game 1. That’s not good for a team with limited playoff experience to begin with. Let’s not forget that this club finished 29th in 2012-2013, and like I mentioned earlier, their success this year has been had without the approval of fancy stats guys (the same people who warned us of a Leafs collapse all year).

Who wins : Colorado in 6. A sneaky good offense, Semyon Varlamov is solid in net, and there couldn’t be a bigger wildcard out there then Ilya Bryzgalov. Not to mention that Bryz isn’t a fan of the cold, and is probably playing in the coldest and winteries playoff matchup, travelling back and forth between Minneapolis and Denver. Why you heff to be mad?

2. St. Louis vs. 3. Chicago

Why you should watch : This is the other awesome-series-that-we-wish-could-be-the-Conference-Finals matchup. St. Louis fits the mold of the Sharks and Kings as a solid defensive squad with loads of depth scoring. The Blues are suffering from a flurry of injuries, but they should get most of them back, which means we should get a healthy heaping of the David Backes, TJ Oshie, Alexander Steen line, possibly the best two-way line in hockey.

But Chicago obviously ain’t no slouch either. The defending Cup champs are kind of limping into the playoffs, but they’re about to get both Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane back from injury. From top to bottom, there might not be a team with more pure skill than the Hawks. That’s the intrigue of this matchup; where the Sharks and Kings are as close to mirror images of each other as we have in the postseason, the Blues and Hawks are actually very different teams. St. Louis beats you with structure, Chicago beats you with skill and hockey sense.

How it can be an upset : Similar to the Sharks-Kings, I don’t think there’s a favourite here, and if there is, it might actually be the Hawks given all the injuries to St. Louis. So I’ll make the case for both (again). St. Louis might be the most well-structured team in the league. Chicago is supremely talented and obviously knows how to win in the playoffs.

Who wins : Chicago in 7. I’m hoping we can get as close to full lineups on both sides as possible, but I fear that the Blues injuries might be too much to overcome. The Hawks are stacked with winners, and I really believe in that. Watch for Duncan Keith, who is my Norris trophy winner, to be a game-changer.

CUP PREDICTIONS

Finally, with the new NHL playoff format, we actually have real brackets. So here’s what I see going down.

SJ over ANA (5). CHI over COL (5). BOS over MON (7). PIT over PHI (6).

SAN JOSE over CHCAGO (6). PITTSBURGH over BOSTON (7)

SAN JOSE over PITTSBURGH (6).

The Sharks win the Cup! There you go. Feel free to ridicule me come June when I’m way off.

 

 

 

FPR Part 3

Yay advanced stats!

It’s that time again. With the NHL regular season approaching the end, I thought it was a good time to once again update my Forward Production Rating (FPR) rankings using the formula I created.

As a refresher, I’ll go through the formula and its significance, but first, some reminders on the notion of FPR in general.

– This is a measure of production, not value. I’m not trying to solve the “best player in the NHL” debate – that would be impossible anyway considering I’m only using forwards. I’m not even trying to solve the “best forward in the NHL” debate. This simply measures what forwards have been most productive this season (according to the formula).

– All stats come from behindthenet.ca (updated as of Saturday morning).and they’re all 5 on 5 stats. It’s not that special teams aren’t important, it’s that they don’t necessarily reflect the true production (depending on situational context, usage, etc). Again,  history shows that teams with the most even strength scoring chances are usually most sucessful.

Now, onto the formula itself (here’s to hoping one day I won’t need to show and explain it).

Let’s go with Tyler Seguin as the example for the formula. Starting with…

– FPR : Forward Production Rating.

– TOIgame : The amount of 5 on 5 time a forward plays per 60 minutes. For Seguin this season, that’s 14.69 minutes. That number is multiplied by 0.1 and becomes the time on ice factor for the rest of the formula.

– Rel.Corsi : Corsi measures how many more shot attempts (including blocked and missed shots) a team has then the opponent while a player is on the ice as opposed to when he’s off. “Relative” Corsi takes into account the quality of that player’s competition while he’s playing. Tyler Seguin’s Relative Corsi this season is 7.1 (a decent rating). Just like time on ice, Relative Corsi is multiplied by 0.1 for this formula. I’ll refer to this as the Relative Corsi factor.

P60mins : The average amount of points a player scores at 5 on 5 for every 60 minutes played. This season, Tyler Seguin is scoring at a staggering rate of 6.2 points per 60 minutes of 5 on 5 play (second most out of the forwards ranked). I multiply this value by 2, which becomes the points factor.

PlusMinusDifferential60mins : It’s the differential between a team’s 5 on 5 plus-minus while a player is on the ice and the team’s 5 on 5 plus-minus while the player is off the ice, averaged out to 60 minutes. Explained practically, when Seguin is on the ice, the Stars are an average of +1.12 per 60 minutes; when he’s off the ice, they average -0.53 per 60 minutes. In other words, Dallas is actually 1.65 goals better per 60 minutes when Seguin is on the ice as opposed to when he isn’t.

Finally, Relative Corsi factor, the points factor and the Plus Minus Differential are all added together and then multiplied as a whole by the time on ice factor. For Seguin, it turns into

FPR=1.469(0.71+6.2+1.65)

FPR = 12.57

Filters

So where does that place Seguin? Well first, let me note that I only included forwards that have played at least 40 games this season and that have recorded at least an average of 10 minutes of 5 on 5 per 60 minutes. Sorry Greg McKegg of the Leafs (and mainly the Marlies), who leads the league in Corsi at 48.43 (with one NHL game played this year). Kind of impressive for having played on a team who has awful possession stats.

Overall, 300 forwards were ranked and rated. Here’s the top-25.

  1. Sidney Crosby – 14.13
  2. Joe Thornton – 12.86
  3. Tyler Seguin – 12.57
  4. Jamie Benn – 12.57
  5. Henrik Zetterberg – 12.49
  6. Ryan Getzlaf – 12.26
  7. Chris Kunitz – 12.25
  8. Jaromir Jagr – 11.78
  9. Evgeni Malkin – 11.73
  10. Kyle Okposo – 11.32
  11. Corey Perry – 11.19
  12. Patrice Bergeron – 11.13
  13. James Neal – 11.02
  14. Henrik Sedin – 10.72
  15. Claude Giroux – 10.66
  16. Alexander Semin – 10.58
  17. Gabriel Landeskog – 10.55
  18. Jiri Hudler – 10.54
  19. Vladimir Tarasenko – 10.47
  20. Joe Pavelksi – 10.21
  21. Taylor Hall – 10.18
  22. Jonathan Toews – 10.13
  23. Phil Kessel – 10.10
  24. Daniel Sedin – 9.93
  25. Brad Marchand – 9.90

If you’ve been following along, you won’t be surprised with number one. Crosby has led the scoring race basically from start to finish, is solid defensively and generates a lot of chances at even strength. The gap between Crosby and Thornton is the biggest gap between any two consecutively ranked players. Ladies and gentleman, Sidney Crosby, your 2013-2014 NHL MVP.

Now speaking of Thornton, he’s put together a solid few months to climb to second. One of the most interesting things about this top-25 for me is the amount of players who were didn’t crack their respective Olympic teams. Starting with Canada, you have Thornton (2), Seguin (3), Neal (13), Giroux (15), Hall (21) and even Marchand (25). Now, in hindsight, it’s kind of difficult to criticize Team Canada for their roster selection, because they have a shiny medal that’ll end any discussion. But the same can’t be said for the US with Okposo (10),or the Czech Republic with Hudler (18). Food for thought.

I said this last time, and I’ll say it again. This list shows the importance of the quality of linemates. None more apparent then Tyler Seguin and Jamie Benn who have an identical rating, tied for the third best. In fact, of the top-14, only Henrik Zetterberg, Jaromir Jagr, and Kyle Okposo don’t have a linemate in the top-25.

Sticking with trends, almost half (12) of the 25 forwards on this list are centers, including the top-3 and 7 of the top-10. Not really a surprise, because centers generally have more points (they touch the puck more often), so they have that advantage over wingers all things considered equal. Also, 8 of the top-25 are captains.

Another fun thing about this list is that it makes us recognize players who are having really good years but are flying under the radar. That includes those who are doing well despite playing on supbar teams (Jaromir Jagr, Kyle Okposo, Alexander Semin, Jiri Hudler, Taylor Hall), and those who don’t necessarily get as much exposure because they play out west (Vladimir Tarasenko, Gabriel Landeskog).

Speaking of Landeskog and exposure, if you haven’t seen this, well, I’m sorry ahead of time…(shout out to Puck Daddy for the find).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOLLyHz4-Z8

The premise of the video is neat, but Landeskog’s mirror shots are just creepy.

Anyway. That’s that. I’ll do this once more at the end of the season, and hopefully another few during the playoffs.

If anyone is geeky enough like me and wants the entire list of all 300 forwards, send me an email (n_dentremont16@hotmail.com).

NHL Metrics : FPR Update

Almost 6 months ago (already), I wrote a column on the forwards who were the most productive, using a formula I created and that I named Forward Production Rating (FPR). I promised to update the rankings during the season, and being a man of my words, here we are now.

The idea of this rating is to measure NHL forwards’ production. All the statistics I use to arrive to this rating are 5 on 5 stats; to me, 5 on 5 play is the most indicative to a how productive a forward really is. (All stats are as of prior to Monday night’s games and can be found on behindthenet.ca).

It’s fine and dandy to score power play goals, but history shows that the teams that have the most even strength scoring chances are the ones who usually (and I emphasize usually) have the best chance to win.

Now in case you didn’t read my initial column (which you can still do), or you forgot how the formula worked, or quite simply you didn’t understand it the first time and want it re-explained, here it is.

Seems complicated, but it isn’t really. I’ll use Patrice Bergeron as this year’s example, just so you get an idea of what’s going on. From left to right…

FPR : Forward Production Rating.

TOIgame : The amount of 5 on 5 time a forward plays per 60 minutes. For Bergeron this season, that’s 13.92 minutes. This number is then multiplied by 0.1 and becomes the time on ice factor for the rest of the formula.

Rel.Corsi : Corsi is an advanced stat that measures how many more shot attempts (including blocked and missed shots) a team has while a player is on the ice as opposed to when he’s off. “Relative” Corsi is a wrinkle to that stat that accounts for how good the player’s competition is while he’s playing on the ice. For Bergeron this year, that index is 23.8 (which is one of the best ratings in the league I might add). Just like time on ice, Relative Corsi is multiplied by 0.1 in this formula. I’ll refer to this as the Relative Corsi factor.

P60mins : The average amount of points a player scores at 5 on 5 for every 60 minutes played. This season, Patrice Bergeron is scoring 2.16 points per 60 minutes of 5 on 5 play. I multiply this value by 2, which becomes the points factor.

PlusMinusDifferential60mins : It’s the differential between a team’s 5 on 5 plus-minus while a player is on the ice and the team’s 5 on 5 plus-minus while the player is off the ice, averaged out to 60 minutes. Explained practically, when Bergeron is on the ice, the Bruins are an average of +1.49 per 60 minutes; when he’s off the ice, they average +0.59 per 60 minutes. In other words, Boston is 0.9 goals better per 60 minutes when Bergeron is on the ice as opposed to when he isn’t.

So to achieve the final rating, I add the Relative Corsi factor, the points factor and the Plus Minus Differential and then multiply everything by the time on ice factor. For Bergeron, it turns into

FPR=1.392(2.38+4.32+0.9)

FPR = 10.58

Filters

Before I divulge the rest of the rankings, I need to make sure we’re all on the same page. I only included forwards that have played at least 30 games this season and that recorded at least an average of 10 minutes of 5 on 5 per 60 minutes. Buddy that plays one shift, scores a goal and has a Relative Corsi index of 12 for that shift would have a FPR value through the roof, but that doesn’t really represent true production. Consistency is the key here.

Those filters gave me data on 190 forwards. I’m going to list the top-25, and mention some interesting things about that list (and notable omissions).

The rankings

  1. Sidney Crosby – 14.92
  2. Henrik Zetterberg – 13.26
  3. Chris Kunitz – 12.86
  4. Tyler Seguin – 12.12
  5. Joe Thornton – 12.11
  6. Evgeni Malkin – 12.09
  7. Kyle Okposo – 11.94
  8. Jaromir Jagr – 11.85
  9. Corey Perry – 11.76
  10. Jamie Benn – 11.58
  11. Ryan Getzlaf – 11.41
  12. James Neal – 11.28
  13. Henrik Sedin – 10.90
  14. Phil Kessel – 10.74
  15. Jiri Hudler – 10.68
  16. Alexander Steen – 10.66
  17. Pavel Datsyuk – 10.64
  18. Rick Nash – 10.60
  19. Patrice Bergeron – 10.58
  20. Tomas Hertl – 10.42
  21. Tyler Bozak – 10.27
  22. Gabriel Landeskog – 10.26
  23. Anze Kopitar – 10.23
  24. Jonathan Toews – 10.14
  25. Daniel Sedin – 10.13

– No surprise with at number one. At 14.92, Crosby’s #1 rating is not amazing compared to other top FPR ratings of the past years. When I ran the data for last year, he recorded a 20.61, the highest I’ve seen for the past 5 years. Still, his FPR is more than a point and a half (or 12.5%) better than second-place Zetterberg.

– Crosby leads the league in points at 75, but more importantly for this rating, leads the league in even strength points at 49, three more than Ryan Getzlaf, Corey Perry and…Kyle Okposo, the guy you’re probably surprised to see at #7. He makes it that high for that exact reason – point production at 5 on 5 play.

– How about Tyler Seguin and Joe Thornton, both in the top-5? Maybe a bit more fuel to the “Team-Canada-snub” fire?

– If Okposo is surprising at #7, so is his cross-bridge rival Jaromir Jagr, he of the struggling New Jersey Devils. Apparently he’s the only thing keeping the Devils afloat (and maybe a little bit of Cory Schneider). Really impressive work from a guy who must be pushing 80 by now.

– Four Pittsburgh Penguins in the top-12, which doesn’t hurt the “Pens have the best top-end talent up front in the league” argument.

– As much as this measures an individual forward’s production, it is definitely influenced by that forward’s line as a whole. You’ll notice a lot of linemate duos on this top-25, including Crosby-Kunitz, Malkin-Neal, Seguin-Benn, Perry-Getzlaf, Sedin-Sedin, etc.

– Hey look, two Maple Leafs in the top-25! And who says Toronto isn’t a good 5 on 5 team? Oh, right, hard evidence does.

– Having run this exercise now over 5 separate seasons, it seems as though an FPR of 10 is the benchmark for what I’d consider great production at 5 on 5. It may be arbitrary, but it seems to be a clear divider again and again. In this case, Marian Hossa was the only other forward to reach this mark (10.06).

– If you just scan the top scorers in the NHL, you’ll surely be wondering about some important omissions to this list, notably John Tavares, Patrick Kane, Alex Ovechkin and Patrick Sharp, all of whom are in the top-10 in league scoring. Sharp (9.90) and Tavares (9.41) are not far from the top-25, but Kane (7.91) and especially Ovechkin (6.01) rely too much on their powerplay production to crack this ranking.

 

– If this is news to you, here’s a recent article on Ovi criticizing his even strength play. (Some of the arguments there don’t necessarily stand up, but the point is taken overall). That being said, he does have a league-best 39 goals, so it’s not like he doesn’t have any value…

Production vs. Value

And that’s the final point I’ll make on this topic, one I made the first time I published this metric. This isn’t a measurement of forward value, but rather of forward production (at even strength). Just because Ovechkin doesn’t produce significantly at 5 on 5 and doesn’t crack the top-25 of FPR, it doesn’t mean that he’s worthless by any stretch of the imagination. This is strictly a measure of production (for this year) at 5 on 5, which means that in no way am I saying that Kyle Okposo is a better hockey player overall than Alex Ovechkin.

As someone who likes the advanced stats, I felt like this type of rating was missing from the available data, so I tried to make up for it. I won’t pretend that FPR is perfect, nor that it can be used as a standalone to solve any argument. But it doesn’t mean we can’t learn anything from it.

The Resurgent Raptors

At the start of the season, I was the biggest enthusiast of the “Raptors should tank” movement. Just check the article I wrote less than 5 months ago, where I suggested the Raptors should basically do everything besides selling their soul in order to land a blue-chip prospect in the upcoming draft (specifically Andrew Wiggins).

But things change. And the dumbest thing for me to do would be to blindly stick to my guns without adapting to said changes. It’s not so much “jumping on the bandwagon” as it is a re-evaluation of the landscape, one now extremely favourable for the Raptors.

Maybe most experts didn’t expect Toronto to be 20-18 midway through January, but most of them didn’t see the Nets and Knicks start so poorly either. The Raptors have been given a grand opportunity to actually compete in the Eastern Conference, and they now have no reasonable choice but to pursue a playoff spot.

The current landscape

Let’s start with a look at the Eastern Conference itself, where the Raptors are currently third, a conference where only two teams (Miami Heat and Indiana Pacers) would currently be in a playoff position if they held the same record in the West.

  1. Indiana Pacers (31-7)
  2. Miami Heat (28-11)
  3. Toronto Raptors (20-18)
  4. Atlanta Hawks (20-19)
  5. Washington Wizards (19-19)
  6. Chicago Bulls (18-20)
  7. Brooklyn Nets (16-22)
  8. Charlotte Bobcats (17-24)
  9. Detroit Pistons (16-23)
  10. Cleveland Cavaliers (15-25)
  11. New York Knicks (15-25)
  12. Boston Celtics (14-27)
  13. Philadelphia 76ers (13-26)
  14. Orlando Magic (10-30)
  15. Milwaukee Bucks (7-31)

Kind of sad. Only 5 teams are .500 or better. Of those 10 teams under .500, at least four of them are undoubtedly going for a high draft pick next year (Milwaukee, Orlando, Philadelphia, Boston) and three more might be going in the same direction depending on how things go in the next few weeks (Charlotte, Cleveland, and Chicago because of the Derrick Rose injury). Realistically, there aren’t any more than 10 teams trying to make the playoffs.

The only wrinkle for the Raptors might be that division rivals Brooklyn and New York, both of whom have had disappointing starts to the season to say the least, have no reason to tank because neither has a first round draft pick in 2014. There’s no doubt these two will be pushing Toronto all year, especially given the fact that neither is scared to spend money to make the necessary moves.

But as of right now, Toronto has clearly been better than both New York teams. It’s not just about the records, it’s about their play on the court. Sure, the Knicks or Nets might make a run, but who says the Raptors have hit their full stride either?  Toronto has had the toughest strength of schedule of any Eastern Conference team at .520 (Brooklyn is next at .509).

With 20 wins, the Raps are already too far behind on the “tank” game to catch up. At this point, it’s actually easier to make the playoffs than to get a high draft pick. If they try to tank, they’ll probably end up finishing 10th or 11th at worst, which is exactly what they wanted to avoid in the first place.

A reinvigorated team 

Since trading Rudy Gay on December 7th, the Raptors are 14-6, the best record in the Eastern Conference in that span. And that’s no coincidence. When you have a player shooting 38% while hoisting up 25+ shots per game, that can only have a negative effect on the team. It’s addition by subtraction. Not to mention that Toronto acquired four NBA-level depth players in John Salmons, Greivis Vasquez, Patrick Patterson, and Chuck Hayes, who give a much-needed boost to the team’s depth.

But more than that, the Raptors are playing like a team now. You never want to blame one player for the failure of an entire team, but it’s hard not to put two and two together in this case.The ball isn’t sticking like it did when Gay was with the team. Part of it might have been that players felt they could delegate to him and now have had to step up their game, part of it was that he was a redundancy and got in the way of other swing players like DeMar DeRozan and Terrence Ross.

Just look at this ball movement. Sure, it’s again the Bucks, but rarely did you ever see this with Rudy Gay on the floor.

Instead, you saw this.

Yup, that’s DeRozan doing his best Bo Jackson impersonation after Rudy Gay refuses to hand him the ball on the fast break.

The players know it too. In an interview with Zach Lowe of Grantland, DeMar DeRozan clearly confirmed what everyone knows has changed since the trade. “The ball is just constantly moving,” DeRozan says. “We don’t care who scores, or who shoots the ball. Masai [Ujiri, the team’s GM] made the best decision for us to win. You hate to see a close friend go, but he made a good decision. It’s paying off now.”

DeRozan himself has seen his assists per game jump from 2.7 to 4.6, but the biggest benefactor from the trade has been Kyle Lowry. Look at his average stats before and after the Gay trade.

BG : 14.3 points, 6.6 assists, 3.5 rebounds, 42.3% FG, 36.9% 3PT

AG : 17.9 points, 8.1 assists, 4.8 rebounds, 44.3% FG, 43.9% 3PT

Everything’s gone up. And that’s interesting, because figuring out what to do with Kyle Lowry is Masai Ujiri’s biggest decision moving towards the deadline. Speaking of…

The not-so-bleak outlook

Masai Ujiri has a really tough decision on his hands with the Lowry situation. There’s no doubt that he’s been a key factor in Toronto’s resurgence, to the point where it’ll be difficult to sell the fans on trading him now. If the Raps were truly committed to the tank (which the Rudy Gay trade was actually supposed to initiate), they should have dealt him right after the Gay trade to assure that this team would not get that much better. But a 14-6 record since has dictated that this team can (and should) compete for one of the top four seeds in the East.

That being said, there’s this thing called the future that MLSE has had a hard time understanding for a while now, and it would be refreshing to see it be addressed. Lowry is an unrestricted free agent at season’s end, and although he’s said he’s open to resigning with the team, he certainly hasn’t committed to resigning either. And this team can’t afford to let this guy walk. We’ve seen that story too often.

I think the Raptors need to make a push to resign him, even if they need to give him extended term. Some people might say he’s not an elite point guard, and that might me true, but that doesn’t mean you can’t win an NBA championship without one (might be getting ahead of ourselves, but that’s obviously the endgame here). Let’s just look at the starting point guards on the 5 last championship rosters.

  • 2013 – Miami Heat – Mario Chalmers
  • 2012 – Miami Heat – Mario Chalmers
  • 2011 – Dallas Mavericks – Jason Kidd/Jason Terry/Jose Barea
  • 2010 – Los Angeles Lakers – Derek Fisher
  • 2009 – Los Angeles Lakers – Derek Fisher

None of those are elite point guard (Kidd and Terry were well past their time). What those teams did have was at least one superstar (LeBron and Wade for Miami, Nowitzki for Dallas, Kobe for Los Angeles). You can certainly argue that the Raptors don’t have a superstar, but who knows what DeRozan or (probably more likely) Valanciunas can turn into? Either way, Lowry has a good combination of passing ability, three point shooting and defense that makes him very useful for a potential championship team. Try to keep him.

For the first time in years, the Raps future doesn’t necessarily look bleak. DeRozan and Valanciunas look to be core pieces to build on. If they can get Lowry signed, they might be a few pieces away from a legitimate contender, at least for the next few years while Eastern Conference teams are still recovering from this year’s tank effort.

(And say what you want about him, but Drake is a legitimate asset for MLSE and the Toronto Raptors. If you don’t believe me, just ask newly acquired TFC striker Jermaine “Don’t Call Me Willem” Defoe how impactful Drake’s influence can be. He’s a mega-star in the hip-hop world, a world oft frequented by the men of basketball. I wouldn’t be surprised if he can lure a couple free agents to town).

Go for the playoffs. Try to make a run. God knows the franchise could use a playoff series win, having only one in its 19-year existence. All of a sudden, maybe luring free agents to town could become a bit easier. And instead of guys leaving to go elsewhere, they’d leave their current teams to come to Toronto.

Wouldn’t that be refreshing.

Team Canada Final Roster : First Impressions

Team Canada’s Olympic roster was announced this morning and already loads of analysis, opinion and criticism are pouring in. Which is ironic for me to say, because I’m about to do the same.

But it was a fun morning. Especially thanks to Canadian Olympic Committee president Marcel Aubut who “really tinks dat Canada is committed to finishing wit de gold médal” or something like that. He might still be talking. (Seriously, can we cut the crap with the politicians? I get that it’s an important event and politics play a big role, but I think one politician would be plenty. The friggin’ Minister of Transport was there for god sakes! I know hockey is a fast-moving sport, but come on, seriously?).

My first thoughts on this team was that Canada obviously wanted to keep the structure of a “team”, with 4 forward lines and 3 defense pairings and specific roles for each of those lines. Checking forwards and left-handed defensemen are what stood out to me the most. We’ll see how this technique works out; we saw in Vancouver (with guys like Brendan Morrow and Patrice Bergeron) that this worked, but we just saw how it can fail with the past World Juniors. Sometimes the best counter for speed and skill is even more speed and skill, especially on the big ice and in a one-and-done type tournament.

That being said, I still like this team a lot. That was a given really, because there’s so much skill here that Steve Yzerman couldn’t really get it wrong (at this juncture anyway). There was a lot of tough decisions, but either way this team was always going to be (and still is) a favourite to win gold. So good job Stevie Y.

By now you probably know the team in and out, so I’ll present it by position with my thoughts (in the same order Canada did, minus the useless switch to announce the final three forwards). In bold, I’ll have the players I thought would make the team, and I’ve arranged it with the depth chart I imagine as the squad was named.

So, let’s start in net.

Mike Smith took the 3rd spot in net, the only real spot up for grabs.

Carey Price 

Roberto Luongo

Mike Smith

This wasn’t extremely difficult, but I got it right, so point for me. Again, it’s becoming clearer and clearer that Carey Price will be the starter in Sochi, while Roberto Luongo is his consensus back-up. Luongo suffered a minor injury recently, but it’s not supposed to be serious. If it becomes more of an issue, that’s when things become interesting.

Does Team Canada move Smith into the 2nd spot and put a Fleury or Brodeur type in the 3rd spot as a mentor, or do they keep Smith in the press box and bring in one of the other strong candidates like Corey Crawford or Braden Holtby? Hopefully we won’t get that far anyway, but it’s something to think about moving forward.

Notable omissions : Corey Crawford, Braden Holtby, Marc-André Fleury, Martin Brodeur

One of the most debated players, PK Subban makes Team Canada, and deservedly so.

Duncan Keith – Drew Doughty

Marc-Édouard Vlasic – Shea Weber

Jay Bouwmeester – Alex Pietrangelo

PK Subban

Dan Hamhuis

So I guess this whole “4 leftys and 4 rightys” thing wasn’t just talking heads. I would not have been surprised with 3 and 5, but I’m surprised that both Vlasic and Hamhuis made the team. For me, it’s a redundancy. And I know I was probably alone in the Phaneuf camp, but at least he brings a bit of offense too. All three are minutes guys, but for me Vlasic and Hamhuis are basically identical. Phaneuf brings a bit of versality.

The top pairing here is really the ideal one. Keith and Doughty are possibly the two best all-around defensemen in the NHL. Two guys that can play in all situations, strong on both ends of the ice, which includes skating and puck-moving ability (at a premium on the big ice surface).

The second pairing is the traditional “shut-down” duo, the one you’d play on penalty kills and against the opponent’s top line. I have Vlasic over Hamhuis in alongside Weber, but that could change.

I think it’s a mistake if Bouwmeester and Pietrangelo don’t play the majority of their time together; that’s why you brought both of them. They have a nice offensive touch that fits well on the third pairing.

As for the extras, I have Subban as my 7th guy/powerplay specialist, and Hamhuis sitting in the press box, initially at least.

Notable omissions : Brent Seabrook, Dion Phaneuf, Kris Letang, Dan Boyle, Mark Giordano

I already said what I had to say about Phaneuf. To think that he wasn’t in the mix at all is ridiculous now, especially when Babcock said this morning that they even went as far as considering having 5 leftys and 3 rightys on the blueline. If that’s the case, Phaneuf and Giordano are battling for that spot in my opinion (and maybe still do if something happens to one of the leftys).

I think Seabrook is the one most hurt by this lefty-righty balance. In my opinion, he deserved a spot on the team, but I agree that Subban is ahead of him on the depth chart. You have to think he’s the next man up on that side of the ice.

There’s no doubt that chemistry played a role in Chris Kunitz making Team Canada alongside linemate Sidney Crosby.

Chris Kunitz – Sidney Crosby – Steven Stamkos

John Tavares – Jonathan Toews – Patrick Sharp

Jamie Benn – Ryan Getzlaf – Corey Perry

Patrick Marleau – Patrice Bergeron – Jeff Carter

Rick Nash – Matt Duchene

This is how I would have envisioned the top 3 lines prior to the announcement, and with all 9 confirmed on the team, I still see it the same way.

The first line is obviously the scoring line (although all 14 forwards can score). I saw on TSN today that this projected top line could be “all-world”, whatever that means. Kunitz obviously has great chemistry with Crosby, that’s why they put him on the team, while the thought of Sid and Stamkos together is equally enticing.

Just like with Kunitz, I like the idea of Sharp playing with Toews. Again, you might as well play them together (initially) if you bring them both to Russia. And I think Tavares is playing on the wing in Sochi because of the fact there are so many good centers on the team and that he might be a bit too slow to keep up with the best centers in the world. But his fantastic skill puts him on a prominent role on this team, especially on the powerplay.

Third line is the power line as I stated in my last column. All 3 are big bodies that attack the net and can score. Something to look for though might be who replaces Benn if Canada needs to shake things up. I can see Rick Nash fit that same mold, or Chris Kunitz, who also had success with Getzlaf in Anaheim.

Apparently Team Canada really wanted a fourth line, which is why they brought Patrick Marleau and Jeff Carter. I think Patrice Bergeron had already earned his spot a while ago, but I’m surprised with Marleau and Carter. At the very least, they’re good two-way forwards that’ll probably kill penalties and take defensive faceoffs (all three can play center).

I don’t think Duchene has a spot in the top 4 lines just yet, but I like his speed if that’s what’s needed. He can be a 13th forward, but he could also play on the second line. As for Nash, I feel as if this is more of a loyalty/sentimental pick, because he hasn’t earned it with his play this season. It is nice to have a former Olympian on the bench though, especially someone like Nash who has fared so well in international tournaments. Still, I really think Claude Giroux or Martin St. Louis deserved on of those final spots.

Notable omissions : Martin St. Louis, Claude Giroux, Joe Thornton, Logan Couture, James Neal, Mike Richards, Milan Lucic, Taylor Hall, Eric Staal

The crazy thing is that most of these guys are probably still in the mix in case of injury. I say that because it’s apparent that Team Canada selected just that: a team, not a group of individuals. Steve Yzerman and that Canadian brain trust clearly identified roles for every player and a team structure, as evidence by the righty-lefty balance on D and the clear “checking line” up front.

If something were to happen that Steven Stamkos wouldn’t be able to play, or another skilled guy like Duchene was injured, I think Martin St. Louis or Claude Giroux are the next best bets. If something happens to a center, maybe it’s Joe Thornton. If a power winger goes down, maybe it’s Lucic or Hall. And if it’s one of the checking forwards, Richards and Couture are probably up next. Pierre LeBrun even suggested earlier in the first intermission of the Leafs-Islanders game that James Neal could be a replacement for Steven Stamkos (to form a mega-Pens line of Kunitz, Crosby and Neal).

So this isn’t done. There’s a good chance something still changes by February 13th. Stay tuned.

The Final Cut(s) : Predicting Team Canada’s Olympic Roster

Sidney Crosby and Jonathan Toews are two locks to make Team Canada up front.

It’s almost here. Well, the announcement anyway. Canada’s first game in Sochi is more than a month away, but the roster is announced tomorrow morning. Twenty-five Canadian-born NHLers will be overjoyed, many will be disappointed. Fourteen forwards, eight defensemen, and three goaltenders will make up the squad that will be sent to Russia to defend Olympic gold and, just as importantly, Canadian pride.

And let me tell you, as if the pressure wasn’t already sky-high to begin with (which it is), the fact that Canada hasn’t won a gold medal in any major international tournament (World Championships and World Juniors) since Vancouver should blow the roof off of the pressure barn. “Our game” is on the line here, because it hasn’t been “ours” recently. Not since Sidney Crosby beat Ryan Miller five-hole a bit less than 4 years ago.

So Steve Yzerman and that management group need to get it right, and it’ll be a pretty simple evaluation procedure. If Team Canada wins gold, they got it right. If it doesn’t, they didn’t.

As for “my” team, there are two ways I could present this. I could give you the 25 players I think should be going to Sochi, or the 25 players I think will be going to Sochi. There’s a difference. But since my opinion on who should make the team matters about as much as public perception matters to Rob Ford, I’ll give you the team that I think will be in Russia come February.

Let’s see how close I can get. Let’s start with the forwards.

Chris Kunitz – Sidney Crosby – Steven Stamkos

John Tavares – Jonathan Toews – Patrick Sharp

Jamie Benn – Ryan Getzlaf – Corey Perry

Eric Staal – Patrice Bergeron – Claude Giroux

Martin St. Louis – Logan Couture

Line 1 : Hey look who’s back! It’s half-human, half-superhero Steven Stamkos, who is already back skating in full gear less than two months after breaking his leg. He’s on track to be back in action at the end of January, which means that he should be able to play in Russia. Kind of amazing, really. Crosby is a lock on the first line, obviously, and I think Kunitz deserves to be brought along with him. They’ve been unreal together this season (as usual), with both players averaging over a point per game. And even if Kunitz doesn’t make the first line, how can you not bring him as a 14th guy to have options if Sid is struggling?

Line 2 : Toews is the next lock after Crosby, and Tavares is not far behind them. I didn’t have Sharp on my team a few months ago, but he’s been on an absolute tear of late, and like the Kunitz-Crosby situation, it’s always nice to have a few guys who already have chemistry given that most of these guys don’t play with each other.

Line 3 : Our third duo comes via the “power-forward” line that pairs Jamie Benn alongside Anaheim’s Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry. If there is debate on Kunitz and Sharp, I don’t think there’s any debate about Getzlaf-Perry. They’re basically inseparable, more so than any other two guys on this whole team in my opinion. I think Jamie Benn fits nicely here. I had Hall in this spot last time, but I don’t think there’s any doubt that Benn has overtaken him.

Line 4 : For me, Patrice Bergeron needs to be on this team. He’s right behind Datsyuk and Toews as one of the best two-way centers in the league. He can kill penalties, win faceoffs, and play against the best players on the other team, not to mention his underrated offensive abilities. Eric Staal is definitely a bubble guy, especially after his injury Saturday night (that thankfully doesn’t sound too serious). Giroux might not be a “fourth line guy”, but that doesn’t worry me. This is a tournament where you can’t have too much speed and skill.

Extras : I think Couture deserves to be on the team, and he might climb the depth chart, but for now I have him as my 14th skater. I’d feel comfortable using him in just about any situation.

As for St. Louis, I just can’t see him not being on the team given the relationship with Steve Yzerman. I debated over Rick Nash and Matt Duchene for a long time, but in the end I just closed my eyes and thought there’s no way Yzerman isn’t bringing him on the team. Too much speed, skill, work ethic and, obviously, familiarity.

And if you don’t think these type of politics matter, just look to the Americans where that management group that includes Pens GM Ray Shero and head coach Dan Bylsma brought on both Paul Martin and Brooks Orpik. (A great read here on how the US team was selected, for all you hockey geeks. Just fantastic work from Scott Burnside. Ended up starting a little feud between Bobby Ryan and Brian Burke too).

Notable omissions : Matt Duchene, Rick Nash, Joe Thornton, Mike Richards, James Neal, Taylor Hall

…and on and on and on. Our “B” team would probably have the 3rd or 4th best forward group in the tournament. No complaints here though. I like Duchene, and I thought he had earned a spot early on, but I think he’s lost it in the past 6 weeks or so. For me, Nash is the biggest wildcard; he could easily replace Kunitz or maybe even Sharp or Benn. He hasn’t had the best season this year, but he’s won gold with Canada before and he’s a solid power forward. And if Canada doesn’t feel like it has enough “grit”, Mike Richards may get a call too.

Now, moving on to defensemen.

Doughty-Weber

Keith-Subban

Bouwmeester-Pietrangelo

Seabrook-Phaneuf

Doughty, Weber and Keith are no-brainers. Pretty much everyone agrees that they’re the top-3. And I think Bouwmeester-Pietrangelo, as a pairing, are pretty much locked in the team at this point. Great two-way defensemen playing for one of the league’s best teams.

After that, it gets interesting. I can’t see Subban not making the team at this point, and I actually believe he’s earned a spot in the top-4. If Canada doesn’t feel like it can trust him against the big boys, they have a fail-safe in Seabrook to play with Keith, a duo that does pretty well with the defending Stanley Cup champion ‘Hawks. But either way, I want Subban on the powerplay, so he has to dress in my opinion.

As for the 8th guy, I need two things : a left-handed shot, and a guy that is used to playing big minutes. Your 8th guy is the guy that goes in if there’s an injury (or someone is struggling mightily). Phaneuf is still that guy for me. He’s the captain and the player that logs the most minutes for the biggest hockey market in the world; he can handle the pressure. He’s a +15 this year (on a team who’s differential is -8 overall) and is playing some of the best hockey of his career.

Notable omissions : Marc-Édouard Vlasic, Kris Letang, Dan Hamhuis, Dan Boyle

Right now, the only change I can see to this group of 8 is Vlasic coming in to replace Phaneuf (or Subban, gulp). That’s without injuries affecting the roster until Sochi of course. Letang hasn’t been reliable all season (both on the ice and health-wise), but he or Boyle would probably get the call if they needed another puck-moving defenseman because of injury. Maybe Hamhuis makes it as the 8th guy, but I can’t see it right now.

And goalies!

Carey Price

Roberto Luongo

Mike Smith

I think Carey Price has cemented the role of opening night starter in Sochi. He’s been outstanding all year; he’s calm, cool and collected in net. He doesn’t have Olympic experience, but he was part of an important World Junior team that had an intense shootout win over the States, so he’s got the shootout thing covered too.

And if Price is locked in at #1, I think Luongo is locked in at #2 right now. Having a great season in Vancouver, putting all that Schneider drama behind him and just stopping pucks. And it’s always nice to have a gold-medal winning goalie on the bench, just in case something happens and you need to make a switch (which is exactly what happened in 2010). He’s proved useful in this role before, and I have no reason not to trust him to do it again this time around.

Really the only debate is with the 3rd stringer. I have Mike Smith, just because he’s been solid for a few years now in Phoenix, consistently putting together solid starts for the Coyotes. Either way, the third-stringer needs to be a guy that is fine with not seeing a single moment of action, just really being there for the ride. Because if your third-stringer is playing in any circumstance during this tournament, something has gone horribly wrong. Let’s hope it doesn’t.

Notable omissions : Corey Crawford, Braden Holtby, Marc-André Fleury, Martin Brodeur

Like I said, the only debate is for the 3rd guy, so if everything works fine, you could go a bunch of ways with it. You could bring a guy that just won a Cup (Crawford), the guy who was the third-stringer for Canada in 2010 (Fleury), or even someone who’s just there to mentor the two other netminders (Brodeur). The problem with that thought-process is that, if either Price or Luongo suffers an injury between the moment the roster is announced and the start of the Olympics, suddenly your third guy becomes your second guy, and that’s when you need to be able to trust him. That’s why I go with Smith.

Week 17 NFL Picks

Week 17 already! Time flies, it’s incredible. And maybe for the best, because I’ve been downright horrible at this. I make the Houston Texans look good. But that’s ok, because the games themselves have been great. And if you really want some betting advice, just go against my picks every time.

16 games, lots to be decided. In the AFC, the top 5 playoff teams are basically set : Denver, New England, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Kansas City. There can be a bit of movement between the top 4, but they’ve all won their respective divisions, so KC is locked into the 5th seed. Only the second wildcard spot is really in play, and the best shots are (in order) : Baltimore (8-7), Miami (8-7), San Diego (8-7), and Pittsburgh (7-8). But the weird part is that there aren’t any “win-and-they’re-in” scenarios for that 6th seed. Everyone needs some kind of help.

We’ll start quickly with the Steelers, who need a win and all other three to lose (because of their record). As for the other three, the tie-breakers are interesting. Obviously, if one of the the three wins and the other two lose, that winner is in. But besides that, here are the other possible scenarios :

– Baltimore clinches with a win and a San Diego loss; or a win and a Miami loss.

– Miami clinches with a win and a Baltimore loss; or a win and a San Diego win.

– San Diego only clinches if Miami and Baltimore both lose (barring ties).

In the NFC, things are more straightforward with 5 of 6 teams having clinched playoff spots, and only 2 fighting for the other wildcard spot. That being said, no divisions have been locked up yet (which is insane), so we’ll start there.

– NFC North : Chicago and Green Bay play each other for the division title.

– NFC East : Dallas and Philadelphia play each other for the division title.

– NFC West : Seattle can clinch the title with a win, San Francisco can clinch with a win and a Seahawks loss.

– NFC South : Carolina clinches the title with a win, New Orleans clinches with a win and a Panthers loss.

– Wildcard : New Orleans clinches with a win or an Arizona loss; Cardinals clinch with a win and a Saints loss.

Now that we’ve set the stakes, let’s get on with the picks.

Carolina Panthers (-6) over Atlanta Falcons

Under a touchdown for this seems criminal. The Falcons (4-11) are really bad at football. You saw what the Panthers (11-5) were able to do to the Saints offense, they should be fine against Matty Ice-cold. The division title is Carolina’s for the taking; the Cats should walk all over the Birds.

Jacksonville Jaguars (+10.5) over Indianapolis Colts

I just think 10.5 is too many points here. The Jaguars (4-11) have only been outscored by double digits once in the past 2 months, going 4-3 in that time. They haven’t been horrible with Chad Henne under center, and “not horrible” should be good enough to cover here. The Colts (10-5) might have a shot at the 3rd seed with a win, but there isn’t a whole lot on the line for them.

Miami Dolphins (-6.5) over New York Jets

A few things you need to know about this one. (1) The Jets (7-8) are just 1-6 on the road this year, (2) they’re 0-7 in every second game (starting in Week 2) being outscored by an average of 19 points (they won last week), and (3) the Dolphins (8-7) have their season on the line.

Baltimore Ravens (+6.5) over Cincinnati Bengals

I think the Bengals (10-5) will ultimately win here, but I think it’ll be a close one. 10 of Batlimore’s 15 games this year have been decided by 6 points or less, including 6 of 7 on the road. Unfortunately, they’ve lost 4 of those 6, and I think we’ll see something similar here.

Pittsburgh Steelers (-7) over Cleveland Browns

This is the last of the early games that mean anything, and for the Steelers (7-8) it’s win or go home (it actually could be win and go home, but anyway). Pittsburgh has been one of the hottest teams of late, winning 5 of 6 to stay in the playoff hunt. Cleveland (4-11) has been done for a while now, and they’ve pretty much thrown in the towel, losing 6 straight games. They’ll get up for a division matchup here to try to play spoiler, but I still think the Steelers cover.

Detroit Lions (+3) over Minnesota Vikings

Washington Redskins (+3) over New York Giants

Tennessee Titans (-6.5) over Houston Texans

The only three games that have absolutely no playoff implications, and those are always tough to pick. I can’t over-think them because you can never tell who really comes out to play when nothing matters, but I’ll give you my reasons for each game in a few words. Detroit :Adrian Peterson is out. Washington : Kirk Cousins has been pretty good and has covered in both starts. Tennessee : No team can possibly be more dysfunctional than Houston.

Green Bay Packers (-3) over Chicago Bears

Look who’s baaaaaaaack! Former MVP and successful mustache-wearer Aaron Rodgers will start at quarterback for Green Bay (7-7-1) for the first time since Week 9 when the Packers lost to….the Bears (8-7) of course. Talk about the perfect revenge storyline. Sure, he’ll be rusty initially, but he’s still a huge difference maker. Green Bay averaged a bit less than 22 points in his absence, but they put up 29 per game in his 8 starts. Not to mention another (more underrated) return, that of Randall Cobb, the explosive wideout who should help Rodgers ease back into action. I’ll take the Pack to win the NFC North.

Kansas City Chiefs (+9) over San Diego Chargers

Probably one you want to stay away from, because you don’t know how long (if at all) the Chiefs (11-4) starters will stay in the game (again, this game doesn’t really mean anything to them because they’re locked in the 5-seed). But that doesn’t mean the backups won’t play their hearts out to try to earn a bigger role. And as for San Diego (8-7), if either Baltimore or Miami wins in one of the early games, the Chargers won’t have a shot at the playoffs, so this game doesn’t necessarily mean anything for them either. I’ll just take the points and hope for the best.

Seattle Seahawks (-11.5) over St. Louis Rams

New Orleans Saints (-11) over Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Neither line scares me, because the Seahawks and Saints are among the best home teams in the league with a combined 13-1 record. Seattle (12-3) has outscored teams at home by an average of 17.5 points going 6-1, while New Orleans (10-5) is undefeated at the Superdome, outscoring opponents by 16 points. Both teams are playing for potential divisional titles, and neither the Rams (7-8) or Bucs (4-11) are too scary.

Oakland Raiders (+10.5) over Denver Broncos

At least one of these double-digit lines has to miss, and I’m thinking this one. All Peyton Manning has left to play for is the passing yards record (he needs 266 more) now that he’s set the touchdown record. I think Denver puts up a bunch early, seals it by halftime, and takes its foot off the gas. The Broncos (12-3) need to win to clinch home field throughout the playoffs, and they’ll probably have it wrapped up early, but I feel like Oakland (4-11) will put up some points late for a garbage cover.

New England Patriots (-7) over Buffalo Bills

After playing in 5 consecutive games decided by 4 points or less, New England (11-4) finally put it all together last week for one of its best performances of the year, crushing Baltimore 41-7. I think they keep that momentum going against an even weaker Bills team (6-9). The Pats still have a shot at home field throughout the playoffs, so they’ll definitely go for the win. And it should be an easy one.

San Francisco 49ers (-1) over Arizona Cardinals

Should be a really good game here. Like I mentioned earlier, San Francisco (11-4) could still win the NFC North with a win and a Seattle loss, while Arizona (10-5) needs a win and a Saints loss to make the playoffs. Both teams are playing well of late; San Fran is on a 5-game winning streak (for the second time this year), while the Cards have won 3 straight and 7 of 8 overall. But I can’t trust Carson Palmer to lead his team to a big win; his 21 interceptions are second-most in the NFL (only Eli Manning has thrown more picks). Plus, the Niners are 5-0-0 as away favorites this season. Sounds like a good trend to me.

Philadelphia Eagles (-7) over Dallas Cowboys

Honestly, if this wasn’t the NFC East, this line would be at least double digits. The Cowboys (8-7) are so bad on defense it’s almost laughable, and despite what everyone wants to say about him, Tony Romo was really the only reason they were winning games. Dallas hasn’t beaten a team with a winning record this season. Meanwhile, the Eagles have no problem scoring to begin with, so the Cowboys junior varsity level defense shouldn’t be an issue for Nick Foles, LeSean McCoy and company. Aside from a bad loss to Minnesota a few weeks ago, Philly has been really strong in the past two months and deserves this division.

Last week : 5-9-1

Season : 41-53-5